It's May 16, 2024, 09:41:50 AM
Its a controversial topic.. its up to our generation to basically decide whether our species survives or collapses. Our population has grown at an exponential rate for the last 300 years... its obvious that we are reaching the Earth's carrying capacity.. There are only so many nutrients in the land/ocean to support the food chain..and we're taking them out at an unprecedented rate. Until we have the technology to colonize other planets, our only option is to stabilize our birth rate or will will inevitably see a dramatic population collapse. The only solution I can see is to adopt a global one-child policy. It has had some success in China.. The downside is there has been widespread forced abortions, sterilizations, corruption etc. But really its our only option, there must be a way of doing it ethically.Maybe offering the first-born free education/health care if the parents have a historectimy/vasectomy after the birth... or giving free education to couples who choose not to have kids at all. The problem is how to punish couple who 'accidentally" have 2nd or 3rd kids... a $$ fine might have to be good enough. The money can go towards green initiatives. The rich get to have more kids.. Problem?? Fuck that, at least they can support the families.. and eventually they arent so rich anymore because the money gets spread out over more descendants. Its bullshit that the poorest families in the world have the highest birthrate.. when they have no hope of supporting so many kids. (I know in some cases they dont have access to birthcontrol.. thats something that needs to be addressed) Obviously I'm against genocide and exterminations... but our current global birthrate isnt sustainableHow can a child-limiting policy be enforced on a global scale? A binding international treaty? A global government? I dont know.. but if there's a better idea out there.. I'd like to hear itIf we don't bring our population to a sustainable level.. Mother Earth will do it for us.. with disease and starvation.also.. I thought i'd point out that if all humans became vegetarians... the Earth could support waaaaaaaaay more people, every step up the food chain loses 90% of the energy - thats a simple biological fact.
when it comes down to it the western democracies are probaly the last thatll be hit with a nationwide starvation.
isnt this part of agenda 21? overpopulation is a big problem, but when it comes down to it the western democracies are probaly the last thatll be hit with a nationwide starvation.but i think the whole vegeterian thing is gonna happen later on in a 500 or 1000 years, its already known that in 50 or 100 years beef is going to be luxury because of the cattle and human population ratios. chickens going to be basically the main meat on the market.
That's simply not true to state that Hindu's do not eat meat in fact Ghandi was a hindu all his life and realised one of the greatest holds the occupying english force had over the indians was the fact that many indians were vegetarians and he realised that made them less hungry for change, more docile, weaker more passive individuals. However I wrote it in incorrectly, I should have said the british loved the state of affairs, easier to control millions when they don't have the strength to fight.Copenhagen is not the finish, in the end the aim is for complete centralised globalised control of everyone, which is a panopticon dystopian nightmare. These control freaks are sick perverts and i feel for their lack of humanity.
http://www.larouchepac.com/print/12763December 13, 2009 (LPAC)—The official British policy for the Copenhagen conference is now out, in explicit language: Massive population genocide, on a scale that would make Adolf Hitler blush. The London School of Economics, the anchor of the Fabian Gordon Brown government, has produced a study for Copenhagen, released by the British organization Optimum Population Trust (OPT), calling for the reduction of world population by between three to five billion people between now and 2050. This flagrant call for mass extermination is based on the argument that the single greatest cause of global warming is over-population, and that the most "cost-effective" cure for global warming is radical population reduction.
No I am stating what Ghandi also stated, that vegetarians are weaker, mentally softer individuals, who are more frail, usually fraught with bad health because they don't get the right mix of nutrients. I didn't say vegetarianism itself was a conspiracy, merely that it plays into the hands of those who would look to control if you can make everyone a vegetarian.