It's May 04, 2024, 04:55:13 AM
No I am stating what Ghandi also stated, that vegetarians are weaker, mentally softer individuals, who are more frail, usually fraught with bad health because they don't get the right mix of nutrients. I didn't say vegetarianism itself was a conspiracy, merely that it plays into the hands of those who would look to control if you can make everyone a vegetarian.
it probably sound stupid but what is copenhagen? is is the bankers? top economist advisers? some sort of american or british aristocracy? corporation ceos?my understanding is something of that sort
That's simply not true to state that Hindu's do not eat meat in fact Ghandi was a hindu all his life and realised one of the greatest holds the occupying english force had over the indians was the fact that many indians were vegetarians and he realised that made them less hungry for change, more docile, weaker more passive individuals. However I wrote it in incorrectly, I should have said the british loved the state of affairs, easier to control millions when they don't have the strength to fight.
Copenhagen is not the finish, in the end the aim is for complete centralised globalised control of everyone, which is a panopticon dystopian nightmare. These control freaks are sick perverts and i feel for their lack of humanity.
Tbh the developed world is so wasteful its probably more down to using whats necessary and being more efficient than mass genocide.
Copenhagen is in a long line of things that government has tried to do.The reality often then not is that nothing gets done.......and everybody has an opinion on it. But the science is solid on what CO2 does. All that 'climate-gate' bullshit was insignificant. Carbon emissions help cause the atmosphere to heat people! Get it together...Now whether that can be used to excuse genocide is another story, the fact of the matter is, is that it simply isn't a national problem, it is the entire worlds problem.The shall be more climate conferences to come.The word today is: comitology.
There are hopes and fears with anything government institutions do but you are naive of humanity if you think thats what Copenhagen is 'all about'. I appreciate all the post-modern oligarch nightmare scenarios being put forward on here and the wider inter-webs, but having less people won't solve the problem of energy consumption. The real issue is how we get and use our energy.Quote from: MediumL on December 18, 2009, 03:05:11 PMTbh the developed world is so wasteful its probably more down to using whats necessary and being more efficient than mass genocide.Exactly.
I havent looked into much of this climategate stuff, from my understanding a few scientists fudged some numbers.. probably to advance their own careers and got caught doing it, it doesnt take away from the countless hours of research that thousands of qualified scientists have done. I've seen first-hand the coral bleaching, without a doubt the atmosphere's temperature is rising.. I admit that the planet naturally goes through periods of heating and cooling, but the rate at which its happening now is unprecedented in known-history.. if reducing carbon emissions can slow the process... then we should be all for it, regardless if its the main cause or not.Quote from: Illuminati Clique on December 18, 2009, 05:38:15 PMThere are hopes and fears with anything government institutions do but you are naive of humanity if you think thats what Copenhagen is 'all about'. I appreciate all the post-modern oligarch nightmare scenarios being put forward on here and the wider inter-webs, but having less people won't solve the problem of energy consumption. The real issue is how we get and use our energy.Quote from: MediumL on December 18, 2009, 03:05:11 PMTbh the developed world is so wasteful its probably more down to using whats necessary and being more efficient than mass genocide.Exactly.Agreed, but only up to a certain point. Even if we maximize the efficiency of farming etc the population is doubling every 40 years... eventually it wont matter how efficient we are. Technology will likely continue to advance until pretty much the end of human existence. Eventually we should be able to convert energy with 100% efficiency (Zero Point Energy/Perpetual Motion). E=MC^2. We’ll be able to convert matter into pure energy and vice versa. When this happens, our options are pretty much infinite.. we’ll be able to make food out of thin air.. and potentially terra-form new planets. Probably allowing our species to reproduce and expand indefinetly. I just have no idea how long it'l take for our tech to advance that far.. The problem right now is providing food for 7 billion people, and the population is doubling roughly every 40 years. No amount of nuclear power can provide the nutrients required to feed the population we have.. or are going to have in the next century. We’d have to cover the Earth in green houses