It's August 23, 2025, 03:33:36 AM
Peyton Manning is your MVP, folks.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:15:40 PMPeyton Manning is your MVP, folks.Not yet, unless you know something I don't.
Quote from: Shallow on December 26, 2009, 04:39:12 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:15:40 PMPeyton Manning is your MVP, folks.Not yet, unless you know something I don't.i would say it's about 95% a given lol.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Shallow on December 26, 2009, 04:39:12 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:15:40 PMPeyton Manning is your MVP, folks.Not yet, unless you know something I don't.i would say it's about 95% a given lol.Hope so, and I hope they go 19-0, because 4 MVPs, a 19-0 season, and two rings would clearly make him the player of the decade in the eyes of history and I've got a lot of Tom Brady fans I need to mock. That being a said an underdog Patriots winning the Superbowl would cause me to go into hiding. Unless Brady gets injured and they do it with a back up.
Quote from: Shallow on December 26, 2009, 05:20:40 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Shallow on December 26, 2009, 04:39:12 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on December 26, 2009, 04:15:40 PMPeyton Manning is your MVP, folks.Not yet, unless you know something I don't.i would say it's about 95% a given lol.Hope so, and I hope they go 19-0, because 4 MVPs, a 19-0 season, and two rings would clearly make him the player of the decade in the eyes of history and I've got a lot of Tom Brady fans I need to mock. That being a said an underdog Patriots winning the Superbowl would cause me to go into hiding. Unless Brady gets injured and they do it with a back up.Peyton would trade it all for Brady's rings.
If Peyton wins the MVP, Shallow is right - LOL at trading all that for Brady's 1 extra ring.CJ should def be MVP numbers wise but he won't.
lol @ assuming the Colts win the Super Bowl.clearly i'm not talking about your continued "if, coulda, shoula, woulda" argument. now back in a world where things just don't happen because our favorite player of all time is involved, aka - reality; Peyton Manning (with one ring, because if i saw him tomorrow & asked to see his Super Bowl rings; he would just hold up the one & admit to me he's choked in the playoffs all these years & for me to not listen to his groupies) would pick up the phone tomorrow, call Tom Brady & discuss some way for them to switch lives; but get rejected because why on earth would Brady trade 3 rings for 1? wouldn't make sense.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on December 27, 2009, 12:30:59 AMlol @ assuming the Colts win the Super Bowl.clearly i'm not talking about your continued "if, coulda, shoula, woulda" argument. now back in a world where things just don't happen because our favorite player of all time is involved, aka - reality; Peyton Manning (with one ring, because if i saw him tomorrow & asked to see his Super Bowl rings; he would just hold up the one & admit to me he's choked in the playoffs all these years & for me to not listen to his groupies) would pick up the phone tomorrow, call Tom Brady & discuss some way for them to switch lives; but get rejected because why on earth would Brady trade 3 rings for 1? wouldn't make sense.What shoulda, coulda, woulda. Nothing has happened yet. I wrote a post about how if things go perfectly this year Manning will have what I said he'd have and then he'd be undisputed player of the decade in the eyes of history. He already is in the eyes of common sense. You entered that post and that world and responded to it. Read what you respond to before you do it.For the record, I don't know about Peyton, but I'd never trade in less talent for more success. Every time I hear someone make a case for Manning it is detailed account of what makes him great. The ONLY, and I mean ONLY thing that brings Brady to the table is the team he played on and the fact that they won. He's no better than Bradshaw.
Quote from: Shallow on December 27, 2009, 08:05:02 AMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on December 27, 2009, 12:30:59 AMlol @ assuming the Colts win the Super Bowl.clearly i'm not talking about your continued "if, coulda, shoula, woulda" argument. now back in a world where things just don't happen because our favorite player of all time is involved, aka - reality; Peyton Manning (with one ring, because if i saw him tomorrow & asked to see his Super Bowl rings; he would just hold up the one & admit to me he's choked in the playoffs all these years & for me to not listen to his groupies) would pick up the phone tomorrow, call Tom Brady & discuss some way for them to switch lives; but get rejected because why on earth would Brady trade 3 rings for 1? wouldn't make sense.What shoulda, coulda, woulda. Nothing has happened yet. I wrote a post about how if things go perfectly this year Manning will have what I said he'd have and then he'd be undisputed player of the decade in the eyes of history. He already is in the eyes of common sense. You entered that post and that world and responded to it. Read what you respond to before you do it.For the record, I don't know about Peyton, but I'd never trade in less talent for more success. Every time I hear someone make a case for Manning it is detailed account of what makes him great. The ONLY, and I mean ONLY thing that brings Brady to the table is the team he played on and the fact that they won. He's no better than Bradshaw.& you play for what Brady has done or not play at all.