It's May 25, 2024, 06:46:06 AM
'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.
Quote from: Rik (Man On The Moon) on January 05, 2010, 01:40:06 PMIf this was the 90's, I'd probably be interested.then whats the point on even commenting? douchebag
If this was the 90's, I'd probably be interested.
both returns were a let down.
Quote from: Young A.G. on January 05, 2010, 01:45:09 PMQuote from: Rik (Man On The Moon) on January 05, 2010, 01:40:06 PMIf this was the 90's, I'd probably be interested.then whats the point on even commenting? douchebagShouldn't you be making a thread on how Sik broke your heart?
As a Hogan mark, this was not exactly what I was hoping for.http://www.youtube.com/v/SizzOV5tFRA&hl=en_US&fs=1&
The ratings are in. Raw did a very average 3.6 in households (but had 5 million viewers probably due to old friends getting together to see Bret Hart). Impact did 1.5 household with 2.2 million viewers. Which is huge for them. Spike has to at the very least commit to Monday Night Specials for TNA. But a head to head weekly show would be ideal.
Quote from: Shallow on January 06, 2010, 10:59:03 AMThe ratings are in. Raw did a very average 3.6 in households (but had 5 million viewers probably due to old friends getting together to see Bret Hart). Impact did 1.5 household with 2.2 million viewers. Which is huge for them. Spike has to at the very least commit to Monday Night Specials for TNA. But a head to head weekly show would be ideal.Raw didn't even bother to have Cena in the show. It was an average Raw. The one with Jesse Ventura was a WAY better Raw. Average Raw>>>TNA Special.
Rumours going around now that TNA might be moved now to Monday nights to go head-to-head with Raw.
TNA had a decent showing on Monday and the ratings show it. Only thing you gotta worry about is audience retention. Can they keep the 1.5 or was that all due to the huge buzz they got Monday?