It's May 16, 2024, 11:10:10 AM
Total Members Voted: 69
how old are you chamilitary?
Quote from: U.N.T.O.U.C.H.A.B.L.E. on March 19, 2010, 03:56:53 PMQuote from: StevenQBosell on March 19, 2010, 03:49:55 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on March 19, 2010, 09:14:44 AMugh, i don't care if you guys pick The Chronic, but PLEASE don't say "it was revolutionary, it set trends, blah, blah, blah". that is the most faggot argument i've ever heard.basically what you're saying is the first hip hop album ever is the greatest album of all time, because it was "revolutionary".i see some of you guys rate albums on impact & shit & that's just fucking dumb; music is music, if it's great it's great; you can't compare albums based on "impact".what you're saying is that there can never be another classic Hip Hop album, because we've seen it all, nothing can be new or "revolutionary" if it's been done the last twenty-five years.give me a break people. I can see how someone can say that, unless they were actually there, and living it in real time, as opposed to reading about someone elses experience. And it's not to say "there will never be another revolution" like Chronic '92... times have changed, there will never be another era like that again.... that's what i'm saying, you're basically saying that all those albums from the '90's are untouchable & NOTHING, can possibly be on that level.Eminem is the last one to have "major impact" & that's only because he was an insane spitter, worked with Dre & most importantly, was white.after Em, there isn't anybody who people we're just like, "omg, that's a certified classic fucking album, top albums ever."nothing is better than a Wu-Tang album because it had more "impact" than anything in the last decade? get the fuck outta here..Quote from: The Veteran on March 19, 2010, 09:42:08 AM^^^you're an idiot... impact plays a big part on what distinguishes a classic from a personal classic.. quality, innovation and impact = classic, understand faggot?no lol, that's my point; quality should be the only thing judged when it's compaing great albums or else we're going to be saying for the next 100 years Illmatic & The Chronic are the two best albums of all time & it's not debateable.
Quote from: StevenQBosell on March 19, 2010, 03:49:55 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on March 19, 2010, 09:14:44 AMugh, i don't care if you guys pick The Chronic, but PLEASE don't say "it was revolutionary, it set trends, blah, blah, blah". that is the most faggot argument i've ever heard.basically what you're saying is the first hip hop album ever is the greatest album of all time, because it was "revolutionary".i see some of you guys rate albums on impact & shit & that's just fucking dumb; music is music, if it's great it's great; you can't compare albums based on "impact".what you're saying is that there can never be another classic Hip Hop album, because we've seen it all, nothing can be new or "revolutionary" if it's been done the last twenty-five years.give me a break people. I can see how someone can say that, unless they were actually there, and living it in real time, as opposed to reading about someone elses experience. And it's not to say "there will never be another revolution" like Chronic '92... times have changed, there will never be another era like that again....
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on March 19, 2010, 09:14:44 AMugh, i don't care if you guys pick The Chronic, but PLEASE don't say "it was revolutionary, it set trends, blah, blah, blah". that is the most faggot argument i've ever heard.basically what you're saying is the first hip hop album ever is the greatest album of all time, because it was "revolutionary".i see some of you guys rate albums on impact & shit & that's just fucking dumb; music is music, if it's great it's great; you can't compare albums based on "impact".what you're saying is that there can never be another classic Hip Hop album, because we've seen it all, nothing can be new or "revolutionary" if it's been done the last twenty-five years.give me a break people. I can see how someone can say that, unless they were actually there, and living it in real time, as opposed to reading about someone elses experience. And it's not to say "there will never be another revolution" like Chronic '92...
ugh, i don't care if you guys pick The Chronic, but PLEASE don't say "it was revolutionary, it set trends, blah, blah, blah". that is the most faggot argument i've ever heard.basically what you're saying is the first hip hop album ever is the greatest album of all time, because it was "revolutionary".i see some of you guys rate albums on impact & shit & that's just fucking dumb; music is music, if it's great it's great; you can't compare albums based on "impact".what you're saying is that there can never be another classic Hip Hop album, because we've seen it all, nothing can be new or "revolutionary" if it's been done the last twenty-five years.give me a break people.
^^^you're an idiot... impact plays a big part on what distinguishes a classic from a personal classic.. quality, innovation and impact = classic, understand faggot?
sorry , Chamillitary Click but any hip hop or rap album from 80's to 1997 is untouchable & better hen anything after 1997 & on . so it is not debateable ,new school. also quality of hip hop & rap went to zero after 1997 .. seee only good quality was from the 80's to 1997 . everything after is crap compared to 80's to 1997.
Quote from: Acgrundy on March 20, 2010, 12:13:31 AMhow old are you chamilitary?18, but before you go anywhere with that you BEST be at least 30; even that is young.there is absolutely no chance that you were 12 years old & understood the times, the scene & the impact that The Chronic had on people, it's just music to anyone at that age.so make your move, champ..
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on March 19, 2010, 04:13:50 PMQuote from: U.N.T.O.U.C.H.A.B.L.E. on March 19, 2010, 03:56:53 PMQuote from: StevenQBosell on March 19, 2010, 03:49:55 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on March 19, 2010, 09:14:44 AMugh, i don't care if you guys pick The Chronic, but PLEASE don't say "it was revolutionary, it set trends, blah, blah, blah". that is the most faggot argument i've ever heard.basically what you're saying is the first hip hop album ever is the greatest album of all time, because it was "revolutionary".i see some of you guys rate albums on impact & shit & that's just fucking dumb; music is music, if it's great it's great; you can't compare albums based on "impact".what you're saying is that there can never be another classic Hip Hop album, because we've seen it all, nothing can be new or "revolutionary" if it's been done the last twenty-five years.give me a break people. I can see how someone can say that, unless they were actually there, and living it in real time, as opposed to reading about someone elses experience. And it's not to say "there will never be another revolution" like Chronic '92... times have changed, there will never be another era like that again.... that's what i'm saying, you're basically saying that all those albums from the '90's are untouchable & NOTHING, can possibly be on that level.Eminem is the last one to have "major impact" & that's only because he was an insane spitter, worked with Dre & most importantly, was white.after Em, there isn't anybody who people we're just like, "omg, that's a certified classic fucking album, top albums ever."nothing is better than a Wu-Tang album because it had more "impact" than anything in the last decade? get the fuck outta here..Quote from: The Veteran on March 19, 2010, 09:42:08 AM^^^you're an idiot... impact plays a big part on what distinguishes a classic from a personal classic.. quality, innovation and impact = classic, understand faggot?no lol, that's my point; quality should be the only thing judged when it's compaing great albums or else we're going to be saying for the next 100 years Illmatic & The Chronic are the two best albums of all time & it's not debateable.sorry , Chamillitary Click but any hip hop or rap album from 80's to 1997 is untouchable & better hen anything after 1997 & on . so it is not debateable ,new school. also quality of hip hop & rap went to zero after 1997 .. seee only good quality was from the 80's to 1997 . everything after is crap compared to 80's to 1997.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on March 20, 2010, 06:21:49 AMQuote from: Acgrundy on March 20, 2010, 12:13:31 AMhow old are you chamilitary?18, but before you go anywhere with that you BEST be at least 30; even that is young.there is absolutely no chance that you were 12 years old & understood the times, the scene & the impact that The Chronic had on people, it's just music to anyone at that age.so make your move, champ..You have to remember, we weren't living in vacuums, you really had to be there to see everyone under the age of 25 bumping the Chronic EVERYWHERE you went, I swear to God it seemed like I was the only person without the "weed leaf" necklace, those were everytwhere, hearing your older brother, sisters and cousins flippiing out over the Chronic, particularly out here on the west coast, in L.A. Lek another poster said, this was the album that put the west on the map, and you knew that was going to be the case from the very 1st listen.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on March 20, 2010, 06:21:49 AMQuote from: Acgrundy on March 20, 2010, 12:13:31 AMhow old are you chamilitary?18, but before you go anywhere with that you BEST be at least 30; even that is young.there is absolutely no chance that you were 12 years old & understood the times, the scene & the impact that The Chronic had on people, it's just music to anyone at that age.so make your move, champ..I AM 30. Now I 100% fully understand the foolishness that you speak. Do yourself a favor and just stop saying the things that you have to say. Seriously man, nothing against you, but you sound like a fucking moron.
Quote from: Acgrundy on March 20, 2010, 05:29:39 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on March 20, 2010, 06:21:49 AMQuote from: Acgrundy on March 20, 2010, 12:13:31 AMhow old are you chamilitary?18, but before you go anywhere with that you BEST be at least 30; even that is young.there is absolutely no chance that you were 12 years old & understood the times, the scene & the impact that The Chronic had on people, it's just music to anyone at that age.so make your move, champ..I AM 30. Now I 100% fully understand the foolishness that you speak. Do yourself a favor and just stop saying the things that you have to say. Seriously man, nothing against you, but you sound like a fucking moron.^ Good times aye AC? Think I still have my dubbed tape of the Chronic lying around somewhere.