It's June 03, 2024, 01:48:07 AM
but the Lakers are "sooooo great", it shouldn't matter, right?
^a few years back , i witnessed him take a Cavaliers team with Big Z as the second best player to the NBA Finals; by his lonesome.in relevance, i saw Kobe Bryant lose Shaq & the year after finish .500.i'm not an expert in logic or anything, but that's a bit sus right there, no?then you trade steal him Pau Gasol & he's right back in the Finals for two years, about to be three.
not yet, but i guess you could say he's on his way.pretty embaressing, the Lakers have the best starting five with a sixth man that would be the second best player on almost any other team & they can't the 8th seed.nice.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on April 27, 2010, 09:27:49 AMnot yet, but i guess you could say he's on his way.pretty embaressing, the Lakers have the best starting five with a sixth man that would be the second best player on almost any other team & they can't the 8th seed.nice. the CELTICS have the best starting 5 son
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on April 28, 2010, 09:28:39 AMbut the Lakers are "sooooo great", it shouldn't matter, right? they are great, we have the best player in the NBA and we have couple of the best big men in the league.if we played like how we played in game 5 every game the results would be the same too.lebron would never be the greatest closer like kobe. lebrons a walking triple double, a legendary point foward but hes not a good down to the wire guy nor is he a jump shooter at heart (which hinders his ability to sink game winning buzzer beaters in his sleep like kobe does i mean cmon man the guys been hitting big shots since he was 19) and plus kobes been a better defender throughout his whole career.
no
LMAO@thread title