It's May 21, 2024, 08:54:07 AM
Quote from: Kill on March 24, 2005, 04:35:33 AMwhites have larger dicks than asians by average thoi hope yall talking about south east and far east asians and not all asians in general.....or i might have to pull the rampuri out on yall
whites have larger dicks than asians by average tho
^^ you think indians beat whites? I wasn´t thinking of anything west of bangladesh in the first place though, if that calms you down
zeppelin had every bit of talent...if not more than the beatles but were no where near as innovative
Quotezeppelin had every bit of talent...if not more than the beatles but were no where near as innovativeBigjake is right Led zeppelin more talented and just as big. In fact in 1969 Led zeppelin took over the charts past the beatles whom never would challenge Led Zeppelin chart wise after 1969.
Quote from: Mattdrush1 on March 30, 2005, 10:48:24 AMQuotezeppelin had every bit of talent...if not more than the beatles but were no where near as innovativeBigjake is right Led zeppelin more talented and just as big. In fact in 1969 Led zeppelin took over the charts past the beatles whom never would challenge Led Zeppelin chart wise after 1969.The Beatles also ended in 69, so of course they couldn't challenge Zeppelin after 1969.
Quote from: Lincoln The Reform-A-Tory on March 30, 2005, 11:22:46 AMQuote from: Mattdrush1 on March 30, 2005, 10:48:24 AMQuotezeppelin had every bit of talent...if not more than the beatles but were no where near as innovativeBigjake is right Led zeppelin more talented and just as big. In fact in 1969 Led zeppelin took over the charts past the beatles whom never would challenge Led Zeppelin chart wise after 1969.The Beatles also ended in 69, so of course they couldn't challenge Zeppelin after 1969.Not to downplay the Fab Four, but I don't think they could have went up against Zep at that time. The Beatles' time was up when Zep became huge, and a new sound was the now in. None of McCartney's or Lennon's albums could compete with those early Led Zeppelin records. This doesn't mean I think if Zep came out in '65 that they would have ended the Beatles run early. It just means there is a time and a place for everything, and the 70s was not going to be bigger for Paul and John, compared to Zep, no matter how you slice it. Just like even if Bonham didn't die Led Zeppelin still would have been finished in the 80s (or went hair metal, but I don't even want to think about that).
Not to downplay the Fab Four, but I don't think they could have went up against Zep at that time. The Beatles' time was up when Zep became huge, and a new sound was the now in. None of McCartney's or Lennon's albums could compete with those early Led Zeppelin records. This doesn't mean I think if Zep came out in '65 that they would have ended the Beatles run early. It just means there is a time and a place for everything, and the 70s was not going to be bigger for Paul and John, compared to Zep, no matter how you slice it. Just like even if Bonham didn't die Led Zeppelin still would have been finished in the 80s (or went hair metal, but I don't even want to think about that).
I really don't think so in terms of influence or sales but whatever.
i thougt jimi was discovered by the bassist of that band who sang "whats your name /whose your daddy/he rich/is he rich like me" (the animals??) oh yeah jimi was also in the airforceand he spent literally hours tuning his guitar before each and every performance
Quote from: Mr. Brown on December 11, 2002, 12:55:35 AMi thougt jimi was discovered by the bassist of that band who sang "whats your name /whose your daddy/he rich/is he rich like me" (the animals??) oh yeah jimi was also in the airforceand he spent literally hours tuning his guitar before each and every performancewats that song called?