It's May 11, 2024, 08:17:17 AM
Boston sucked post-Perkins...Chicago had no real offense and it was clear. LeBron with yet another easy rode to the Finals. still, 0-2...another failure under "the kings" belt.
Quote from: NIKCC on June 13, 2011, 05:40:27 PMBoston sucked post-Perkins...Chicago had no real offense and it was clear. LeBron with yet another easy rode to the Finals. still, 0-2...another failure under "the kings" belt.too bad Lebron couldn't run into a powerhouse team like those 2000 76ers or the 2001 NJ Nets teamslmao
Sacramento? The team the league beat for the lakers?
if anyone actually knows that classic series well enough, they'd know that, IF ANYTHING, some games in the series were reffed in the Lakers favor, but some were also reffed in the Kings favor.....then again, i'm telling this to someone who doesn't even follow basketball, he just follows the Lakers so he can ride my nuts...but look into it.
Quote from: NIKCC on June 13, 2011, 05:40:27 PMBoston sucked post-Perkins...Chicago had no real offense and it was clear. LeBron with yet another easy rode to the Finals. still, 0-2...another failure under "the kings" belt.Heat made it look easy, but Mavs made it look even easier after first round. Mavs def had just as easy a road, at least besides first round
The current lakers should be renamed charmin. Softest team I've ever seen
The lakers are stacked from a talent standpoint. Doesn't make them any less soft