Author Topic: Tom Brady MVP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Read 867 times)

OG Hack Wilson · « **Reply #15 on:** February 07, 2011, 05:15:03 PM »

put Vick behind the pats oline anbd watch him get 5000 tds

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #16 on:** February 07, 2011, 07:30:41 PM »

So much hypothetical talk. We should start rewarding people based off of our imaginations. With you guys, it doesn't matter if there is a lockout next season, we'll just play out the season in our heads. We'll trade players & we'll bring back retired players, dead players, future players, integrate animals into the league. I'm excited for next season.

Shallow · « **Reply #17 on:** February 07, 2011, 07:37:48 PM »

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2011, 07:30:41 PM

So much hypothetical talk. We should start rewarding people based off of our imaginations. With you guys, it doesn't matter if there is a lockout next season, we'll just play out the season in our heads. We'll trade players & we'll bring back retired players, dead players, future players, integrate animals into the league. I'm excited for next season.

I said when Brady has to make tough throws he's less than mediocre. I said it years ago, and every time it happens I'm right. Nothing hypothetical about that. Tom Brady was simply not as valuable as a few other QBs this year. This isn't a most TDs or least INTs or both award. This is an importance to the team award, and Tom simply wasn't as important to Pats as Vick was to the Eagles, Rodgers was to the Pack, or Peyton was to the Colts. The Pats easily could have won the division and lost in the first playoff game with Hoyer. It's a very probably reality. Where as if you look at the level of play that Vick, Manning, and Rodgers showed you can make a much stronger argument for their value. All you have to show in Brady's case are numbers. Numbers never tell the whole story.

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #18 on:** February 07, 2011, 07:49:56 PM »

Quote from: Shallow on February 07, 2011, 07:37:48 PM

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2011, 07:30:41 PM
So much hypothetical talk. We should start rewarding people based off of our imaginations. With you guys, it doesn't matter if there is a lockout next season, we'll just play out the season in our heads. We'll trade players & we'll bring back retired players, dead players, future players, integrate animals into the league. I'm excited for next season.

I said when Brady has to make tough throws he's less than mediocre. I said it years ago, and every time it happens I'm right. Nothing hypothetical about that. Tom Brady was simply not as valuable as a few other QBs this year. This isn't a most TDs or least INTs or both award. This is an importance to the team award, and Tom simply wasn't as important to Pats as Vick was to the Eagles, Rodgers was to the Pack, or Peyton was to the Colts. The Pats easily could have won the division and lost in the first playoff game with Hoyer. It's a very probably reality. Where as if you look at the level of play that Vick, Manning, and Rodgers showed you can make a much stronger argument for their value. All you have to show in Brady's case are numbers. Numbers never tell the whole story.

The day they don't give an award to stats, you PM me & let me know.

Peyton & the Colts had an average year; if they win 14 games too, he woulda gotten some votes. Rodgers missed two games (basically ruins his chance at the award). I understand Vick is valuable, I acknowledge that. However, like I said, the league might have not wanted him to win it.

& we're also getting away from the fact Tom had an amazing season. It's a regular season award. It basically is a most TDs & least INTs award. Because you don't usually have the most TDs & the least INTs; especially not 36-4. Don't act like your ass wouldn't be in here still bitching if the Pats won every game in the playoffs 28-0 & won a ring last night lol. Now that Brady lost to an amazing defense, it's just fuel for your fire.

Shallow · « **Reply #19 on:** February 07, 2011, 08:01:27 PM »

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2011, 07:49:56 PM

The day they don't give an award to stats, you PM me & let me know.

I'm not saying I expected anyone else to win, but I wouldn't have voted for a lot of past winners. But McNair tied with Manning in 03 and he was very valuable that year despite not being on top in any category. I mean Emmit Smith won it once and he was easily never as valuable a RB any year as Barry Sanders.

This is more than just a QB thing with Brady. This is a poster boy for the non-fans thing. They use this guy to sell merch and raise viewership to girls and yuppies who don't even watch Football. And they protect him well. So, here's to an Aaron Rodgers 3-peat!

Chamillitary Click · « **Reply #20 on:** February 07, 2011, 08:04:15 PM »

Quote from: Shallow on February 07, 2011, 08:01:27 PM

Quote from: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2011, 07:49:56 PM

The day they don't give an award to stats, you PM me & let me know.

I'm not saying I expected anyone else to win, but I wouldn't have voted for a lot of past winners. But McNair tied with Manning in 03 and he was very valuable that year despite not being on top in any category. I mean Emmit Smith won it once and he was easily never as valuable a RB any year as Barry Sanders.

This is more than just a QB thing with Brady. This is a poster boy for the non-fans thing. They use this guy to sell merch and raise viewership to girls and yuppies who don't even watch Football. And they protect him well. So, here's to an Aaron Rodgers 3-peat!

More like a Mark Sanchez 3-peat, son.