It's August 22, 2025, 02:24:04 PM
losing in 2nd round to team with identical record>>>losing in 1st round to 8th seed
Quote from: NIKCC on May 15, 2011, 03:45:18 PMQuote from: 7even on May 15, 2011, 02:20:30 AMQuote from: NIKCC on May 15, 2011, 12:29:30 AMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 03:21:07 PMQuote from: NIKCC on May 14, 2011, 02:57:19 PMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.No, they are better off trying to appease him or trading him and Arenas and maybe even Hedo for something else in return, like expiring contracts and lesser paid players. Lol @ your ignorant self-absorbed ass drawing random conclusions because the only option you see is a trade with Lakers, like they are the only team in the league. Stop sniffing.oh, so they should trade Dwight for expiring contracts LMAO....but when the Grizzlies did that with Gasol, it was "robbery by the Lakers" and "the worst trade in NBA history"....are all Germans this dumb when it comes to basketball? Really, if the Magic can get Odom AND Gasol while getting rid of Arenas' contract, I'm pretty sure they'll be more than happy to do it. Surely, even an idiot like u knows that Lakers make the biggest moves in NBA history, so it makes sense to discuss our next potential big move....not the ONLY option, but clearly the most probable one.Not just expiring contracts, if they'd do that they could just let his contract run out. But they definitely have to reason before taking on Gasol's big contract who gives them not all that much as a player. You're the first one crying when niggas call you names for being Jewish, yet you do racial slurs all the time. Faggot ass hypocrite. Just face what a horrible person you are: You insult people because they argue that Gasol for Howard might not be the best the Magic could do. Seriously? You have a terrible personality, just being real with you. Someone ought to beat the shit out of your parents for raising such a spoiled, hypocritical, self-absorbed and ill-mannered tool.Pau Gasol doesn't give them all that much as a player? LOL...and Lamar Odom doesn't either, huh? just a buncha' scrubs.....when did I say Gasol straight up for Howard? I said Gasol AND Odom for Howard AND Arenas awful contract...and the fact that u are acting like it's not such a good deal for Orlando is a mockery. This is basketball discussion, u fucking faggot...quit getting all sensitive and takin it to some other shit when u have nothing to say. "ur not a good person" LMAO...I just believe that a lot of the points u make are fuckin retarded as fuck, and I like to throw jabs at u cuz u get all butthurt...dont be that easy.I perfectly explained everything in my perfectly fine first post in this thread... that you dismissed by acting like I'm retarded and like the Lakers are the only team in the league that Orlando can make a deal with.Like I said before, Orlando has no chance of being a contender after trading Howard, no matter what they get in return. With that said, there is no need for a team that should care about money to pay a player like Gasol all that money for years to come. They should rather focus on reducing payroll and getting young players to re-build with, while trying to stay competitive enough to still make the playoffs in the east, ie winning about 45-50 games. I know exactly what you said but I'm not gonna repeat all that shit and say Gasol for Howard for convenience, dumbshit. <- That's how one should talk according to you, right? Either way there was absolutely nothing wrong with my first post, yet you acted like the bitch that you are. And I don't get butthurt, I'm just annoyed with having childish disputes with immature, terrible people like you, when I all I wanna do is having a civilized and honest discussion about basketball. All I'm saying is that you're a bad person and should improve, not dwell on it and even be proud of it. That's all. I know that might sound gay to you or something, because of the immature, whack raps recording at 25 homer that you are, but still, it's the truth.
Quote from: 7even on May 15, 2011, 02:20:30 AMQuote from: NIKCC on May 15, 2011, 12:29:30 AMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 03:21:07 PMQuote from: NIKCC on May 14, 2011, 02:57:19 PMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.No, they are better off trying to appease him or trading him and Arenas and maybe even Hedo for something else in return, like expiring contracts and lesser paid players. Lol @ your ignorant self-absorbed ass drawing random conclusions because the only option you see is a trade with Lakers, like they are the only team in the league. Stop sniffing.oh, so they should trade Dwight for expiring contracts LMAO....but when the Grizzlies did that with Gasol, it was "robbery by the Lakers" and "the worst trade in NBA history"....are all Germans this dumb when it comes to basketball? Really, if the Magic can get Odom AND Gasol while getting rid of Arenas' contract, I'm pretty sure they'll be more than happy to do it. Surely, even an idiot like u knows that Lakers make the biggest moves in NBA history, so it makes sense to discuss our next potential big move....not the ONLY option, but clearly the most probable one.Not just expiring contracts, if they'd do that they could just let his contract run out. But they definitely have to reason before taking on Gasol's big contract who gives them not all that much as a player. You're the first one crying when niggas call you names for being Jewish, yet you do racial slurs all the time. Faggot ass hypocrite. Just face what a horrible person you are: You insult people because they argue that Gasol for Howard might not be the best the Magic could do. Seriously? You have a terrible personality, just being real with you. Someone ought to beat the shit out of your parents for raising such a spoiled, hypocritical, self-absorbed and ill-mannered tool.Pau Gasol doesn't give them all that much as a player? LOL...and Lamar Odom doesn't either, huh? just a buncha' scrubs.....when did I say Gasol straight up for Howard? I said Gasol AND Odom for Howard AND Arenas awful contract...and the fact that u are acting like it's not such a good deal for Orlando is a mockery. This is basketball discussion, u fucking faggot...quit getting all sensitive and takin it to some other shit when u have nothing to say. "ur not a good person" LMAO...I just believe that a lot of the points u make are fuckin retarded as fuck, and I like to throw jabs at u cuz u get all butthurt...dont be that easy.
Quote from: NIKCC on May 15, 2011, 12:29:30 AMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 03:21:07 PMQuote from: NIKCC on May 14, 2011, 02:57:19 PMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.No, they are better off trying to appease him or trading him and Arenas and maybe even Hedo for something else in return, like expiring contracts and lesser paid players. Lol @ your ignorant self-absorbed ass drawing random conclusions because the only option you see is a trade with Lakers, like they are the only team in the league. Stop sniffing.oh, so they should trade Dwight for expiring contracts LMAO....but when the Grizzlies did that with Gasol, it was "robbery by the Lakers" and "the worst trade in NBA history"....are all Germans this dumb when it comes to basketball? Really, if the Magic can get Odom AND Gasol while getting rid of Arenas' contract, I'm pretty sure they'll be more than happy to do it. Surely, even an idiot like u knows that Lakers make the biggest moves in NBA history, so it makes sense to discuss our next potential big move....not the ONLY option, but clearly the most probable one.Not just expiring contracts, if they'd do that they could just let his contract run out. But they definitely have to reason before taking on Gasol's big contract who gives them not all that much as a player. You're the first one crying when niggas call you names for being Jewish, yet you do racial slurs all the time. Faggot ass hypocrite. Just face what a horrible person you are: You insult people because they argue that Gasol for Howard might not be the best the Magic could do. Seriously? You have a terrible personality, just being real with you. Someone ought to beat the shit out of your parents for raising such a spoiled, hypocritical, self-absorbed and ill-mannered tool.
Quote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 03:21:07 PMQuote from: NIKCC on May 14, 2011, 02:57:19 PMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.No, they are better off trying to appease him or trading him and Arenas and maybe even Hedo for something else in return, like expiring contracts and lesser paid players. Lol @ your ignorant self-absorbed ass drawing random conclusions because the only option you see is a trade with Lakers, like they are the only team in the league. Stop sniffing.oh, so they should trade Dwight for expiring contracts LMAO....but when the Grizzlies did that with Gasol, it was "robbery by the Lakers" and "the worst trade in NBA history"....are all Germans this dumb when it comes to basketball? Really, if the Magic can get Odom AND Gasol while getting rid of Arenas' contract, I'm pretty sure they'll be more than happy to do it. Surely, even an idiot like u knows that Lakers make the biggest moves in NBA history, so it makes sense to discuss our next potential big move....not the ONLY option, but clearly the most probable one.
Quote from: NIKCC on May 14, 2011, 02:57:19 PMQuote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.No, they are better off trying to appease him or trading him and Arenas and maybe even Hedo for something else in return, like expiring contracts and lesser paid players. Lol @ your ignorant self-absorbed ass drawing random conclusions because the only option you see is a trade with Lakers, like they are the only team in the league. Stop sniffing.
Quote from: 7even on May 14, 2011, 01:49:54 PMQuote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future. LOL...so they're better off losing Dwight for nothing than getting Gasol, Odom, AND rid of Arenas contract? you are retarded.
Quote from: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on May 14, 2011, 11:07:35 AMThe negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get. He's the 2nd most overpaid player in the league I guess, and his contract is hard to stomach. Still, he's better than trash and I'm sure Cuban doesn't give a fuck if he can get the best center since Shaq in the process.That said, this trade would obviously be good for the Lakers. I don't even want to explain why or how, because I'm sure of it and so should most people. What's very funny though is this: On the one hand you had Kobe, a broken body but the most focused, most willed player in the game. On the other hand you have Howard, the best body in the game, yet someone who likes to fool around all the time, eating burgers before games in the locker room, chatting with random people courtside while the game is on, stuff like this. It would be funny how Kobe deals with the physical phenomenon that Howard is, when he sees him having 0 focus. Just saying.Next, in all honesty ...and I'm not just saying this because I'd hate for this trade to happen... for the Magic it would not make sense. After trading Howard, they'd have 0% chances of winning a championship. So the best they could do is winning around 50 games and that's it - you don't need Gasol's big contract for this. You really don't. You'd rather save money and build for the future.
The negatives: Lamar IS the Lakers bench. He is inconsistent, but the rest of the bench is ass. And he isnt any more inconsisten than Arenas. And speakin of Arenas, holy shit. That contract is fuckin RIDICULOUS. That might be what holds up this trade. Im sure no one in the NBA wants to take on that contract, for what they are gonna get.
Quote from: NIKCC on May 15, 2011, 06:45:14 PMlosing in 2nd round to team with identical record>>>losing in 1st round to 8th seedIf it makes you feel better. The Grizzlies took OKC to 7 games, and could have possibly won that series as well. They would have beat you guys. The Lakers got past a Hornets team (minus West) that EVERYone wanted to play, then got absolutely humiliated against Dallas. We would have definitely beatin the Hornets had we been lucky enough to play them instead of Memphis.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Print
