Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Interesting stat in Kobe vs Jordan debate......
Mietek23:
a SPECULATION is NOT A STAT therefor your "Kobe vs. Jordan" debate in no longer relevant - face it and move forward dude.
Kobe is a great player, def still the best in this era but he will always be "The SECOND greatest shooting guard in NBA history" next to Michael Air Jeffrey Jordan. He is NOT Michael. He's got many similar things in his character but that's it. Both are/were great players but MJ will forever remain "THE BEST THIS GAME EVER HAD".
As good as Kobe is, he will always be SECOND BEST, next to His Airness.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Mietek23 on July 02, 2011, 05:03:36 AM ---a SPECULATION is NOT A STAT therefor your "Kobe vs. Jordan" debate in no longer relevant - face it and move forward dude.
Kobe is a great player, def still the best in this era but he will always be "The SECOND greatest shooting guard in NBA history" next to Michael Air Jeffrey Jordan. He is NOT Michael. He's got many similar things in his character but that's it. Both are/were great players but MJ will forever remain "THE BEST THIS GAME EVER HAD".
As good as Kobe is, he will always be SECOND BEST, next to His Airness.
--- End quote ---
thats ur opinion...as far as speculation, nothing was speculated in here. i brought up a stat in terms of ratio. in terms of ration, 35.4/97=40.1/110. only an idiot like cham could argue that lol.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 01, 2011, 10:57:29 PM ---You sound upset that I proved this to be pointless.
You just said, "this thread doesn't have to prove anything". Don't act like you just wanted to "educate" us all like, "Crazy...the scoring difference between this year & this year is a wide margin...Outrageous...". No, you made this thread to act like it meant something for Kobe in the "Kobe vs Jordan debate", hence the title.
Now I got you scrambling saying you posted it "just because". I win. You lose. Get used to it.
--- End quote ---
it does mean something in the kobe jordan debate...it means kobe played in an era where there wasnt nearly as much scoring allowed. i know it's too complex for ur dumbass mind, but it's actually quite simple, retard.
Chamillitary Click:
LOL, moron! It's fucking simple. "Interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate........", how is it interesting? What purpose does it serve? Are you really saying you didn't post it for Kobe?
God, you're retarded.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click, literally. on July 02, 2011, 04:26:53 PM ---LOL, moron! It's fucking simple. "Interesting stat in the Kobe vs Jordan debate........", how is it interesting? What purpose does it serve? Are you really saying you didn't post it for Kobe?
God, you're retarded.
--- End quote ---
dumb piece of shit, whether something is interesting is a matter of someones opinion, it's not a fact...so for u to try to prove that wrong, as if there's something to prove wrong, makes u fucking retarded. notice how ur the only 1 in here arguing, even though there are a whole lot of mj ballwashers on this board. thats because only YOU, dumbillitary, are retarded enough to argue statistics. it's a FACT that some peeps might find it interesting to know that kobe played in an era where players scored less. for u to argue that fact makes u not only a retard, but a piece of scum not even worthy of bein stepped on, u faggot.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version