It's May 04, 2024, 12:41:55 AM
discuss?
Pacifism is for fucking pussys, its in mans nature to be violent, aggressive and destructive. Being a pacifist is the equivalent of being a fag, why? because just like a fag your existence is doomed for what you are. Aggression fuels man and gives him the ability to push forward, through pain, suffering, and rivals. Violence is innate to survival from the killing of a rival to a killing of your food, its a requirement. Destruction is necessary for survival in a variety of ways, destruction of tradition, old ways in order to survive. Destruction in morality and of taboos in order to evolve. Pacifism is a concept held for the weak who aren't strong enough to survive. So they invent this concept to reject and to be a top some make believe high ground. A high ground which can not exist without the violence and aggression.
Quote from: Blasphemy (A) on January 15, 2012, 08:30:12 PMPacifism is for fucking pussys, its in mans nature to be violent, aggressive and destructive. Being a pacifist is the equivalent of being a fag, why? because just like a fag your existence is doomed for what you are. Aggression fuels man and gives him the ability to push forward, through pain, suffering, and rivals. Violence is innate to survival from the killing of a rival to a killing of your food, its a requirement. Destruction is necessary for survival in a variety of ways, destruction of tradition, old ways in order to survive. Destruction in morality and of taboos in order to evolve. Pacifism is a concept held for the weak who aren't strong enough to survive. So they invent this concept to reject and to be a top some make believe high ground. A high ground which can not exist without the violence and aggression. You are mixing up a lot of things: Violence, agressiveness and destructiveness. I agree that you can be violent to achieve positive results, like killing for food. But that is not the same as being agressive or destructive. Those two are usually counterproductive, Agression clogs the mind and is bound to affect yourself in a negative way.Besides that, you use the word destruction in ways that I wouldn't. Destroying tradion? Destroying morals? That is simply change you are talking about, not destruction.
I respect the general concept - ie you have to rise to a higher level of consciousness and not participate in violence, violence begets violence, etc.But, I do believe that there is a line in being pacifist and allowing abuse to continue. In that case, I support beating the shit out of whoever is abusing you until they get the hint that they need to stop.
Pacifism is a concept held for the weak who aren't strong enough to survive. So they invent this concept to reject and to be a top some make believe high ground. A high ground which can not exist without the violence and aggression.