Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Bynum=triple double+gets NBA record 10 blocks in playoff game.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 02, 2012, 04:00:32 PM ---You boys are just foolish making sports, eight second affairs. Like the last inning of Baseball or the last thirty seconds of basketball. You guys literally, not even an exaggeration, just don't count 47 minutes & 30 seconds of a game. It's actually astonishing. LeBron James has made it impossible in this series against the Knicks to show "IT" becuase he does "IT" better than anybody else in the playoffs right now & he's winning an average of 20 points per game. & Meho, get the fuck outta here lol. I've played in Baseball, Football, Basketball, Lacrosse leagues. Soccer with friends. I've probably played Hockey in more accumulated time than you've simply made your heart rate go up to 100 beats a minute & I'll include jerking off for you.
Anyway. I don't see where you see this "IT" factor when Bynum was getting benched for not even caring about the team & throwing up three's & saying "Ha, I'll do it again if Mike Brown ever plays me again" lol. Bynum is a great talent. There is no denying that. He's still a child in terms of age & hasn't even reached his prime. But the way you guys judge players with your subjective & in most cases really biased, intangibles we can't measure, it's just pure opinion. Like really? You're really saying, "Well he has more "IT" (some non-measurable form of talent that varies from a person-to-person perspective) than him, so he's just better". I might as well just say, well Derek Jeter just has more "IT" than Albert Pujols, so Jeter is just "X" amount times better than Albert. You don't see the flaws there? I'd rather just hear a "well he doesn't have rings" argument than telling me you see something inside the soul of a player lol.
& NIK, don't derail this thread by coming in here & see you have some "support" against me & just say "lol, Cham's an idiot". Any unbiased man would acknowledge there is tons of validity here, you Laker fans just get stubborn when everything isn't "I LOVE THE LAKERS".
--- End quote ---
there are certain aspects of sports that are not measurable by stats...so for an basketball retard like u, of course, it would be impossible to see without it being spelled out for u. but for people who actually watch and play the game, they can judge players based on the product they see on the court. if u saw a girl walkin down the street, would u base how fine she was on what u just saw in front of ur eyes, or would u need a statistic to tell u how fine she was? or would u just not care all together because u love the cock??
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on May 02, 2012, 05:22:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 02, 2012, 02:40:20 PM ---How you figure? He's stronger, can jump higher. If you were an inch taller than me, but I could jump twice as high as you & was stronger than you...whose more likely to box out & get up to grab a rebound? It's just pure common sense but somehow that doesn't even click to you. That's border line scary on your intelligence lol.
I swear, you'll say anything sometimes. A few months ago you wouldn't even have got me to say Bynum's better on offense. Now you're just saying, "Well, no. Bynum is just better in every facet of the game" lol. Unreal sometimes.
--- End quote ---
lmao...no way ur this basketball retarded. getting rebounds is not all about how tall u are and how high u can jump. if that were the case, kevin love wouldn't even be close to one of the best rebounders in the league. some of the greatest rebounders of all time barely had any hops. u think dennis rodman was as tall or could jump as high as deandre jordan? but who is the better rebounder? LOL...get a fuckin clue, son. not to mention, Bynum has a good 3 inches on Dwight. u dont even belong in these discussions with the points you attempt to make.
--- End quote ---
I mean, I clearly said boxing out. CLEARLY Dwight knows what he's doing, hence why he's always top of the league in rebounds. You're just being a selective reader trying to fight small details inside a main argument. Decent tactic, but I see through it, my boy.
When your entire argument is trying to say Bynum who averages less rebounds a game in his career than Dwight is a better rebounder because give "ideal situations" he would average more. That's nearly as idiotic as you trying to validate Bynum shooting 20% worse when the best scorer in the league isn't playing attracting defenses away & taking more shots.
Chamillitary Click:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on May 02, 2012, 05:37:13 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 02, 2012, 04:00:32 PM ---You boys are just foolish making sports, eight second affairs. Like the last inning of Baseball or the last thirty seconds of basketball. You guys literally, not even an exaggeration, just don't count 47 minutes & 30 seconds of a game. It's actually astonishing. LeBron James has made it impossible in this series against the Knicks to show "IT" becuase he does "IT" better than anybody else in the playoffs right now & he's winning an average of 20 points per game. & Meho, get the fuck outta here lol. I've played in Baseball, Football, Basketball, Lacrosse leagues. Soccer with friends. I've probably played Hockey in more accumulated time than you've simply made your heart rate go up to 100 beats a minute & I'll include jerking off for you.
Anyway. I don't see where you see this "IT" factor when Bynum was getting benched for not even caring about the team & throwing up three's & saying "Ha, I'll do it again if Mike Brown ever plays me again" lol. Bynum is a great talent. There is no denying that. He's still a child in terms of age & hasn't even reached his prime. But the way you guys judge players with your subjective & in most cases really biased, intangibles we can't measure, it's just pure opinion. Like really? You're really saying, "Well he has more "IT" (some non-measurable form of talent that varies from a person-to-person perspective) than him, so he's just better". I might as well just say, well Derek Jeter just has more "IT" than Albert Pujols, so Jeter is just "X" amount times better than Albert. You don't see the flaws there? I'd rather just hear a "well he doesn't have rings" argument than telling me you see something inside the soul of a player lol.
& NIK, don't derail this thread by coming in here & see you have some "support" against me & just say "lol, Cham's an idiot". Any unbiased man would acknowledge there is tons of validity here, you Laker fans just get stubborn when everything isn't "I LOVE THE LAKERS".
--- End quote ---
there are certain aspects of sports that are not measurable by stats...so for an basketball retard like u, of course, it would be impossible to see without it being spelled out for u. but for people who actually watch and play the game, they can judge players based on the product they see on the court. if u saw a girl walkin down the street, would u base how fine she was on what u just saw in front of ur eyes, or would u need a statistic to tell u how fine she was? or would u just not care all together because u love the cock??
--- End quote ---
lol, pure stupidity. It's all opinion. You prove it every time you speak about the Lakers. One day Pau sucks when you're defending Kobe playing alone, the next he's great. LeBron too. Like all kidding aside, you're really going to say LeBron is just a solid all-star & there is nothing extraordinarily special about his game? You don't "see things" you just say what helps your argument. I'll even credit you saying you've said some credible NBA things on here, but you've been wrong about everything LeBron. Between saying T-Mac was better, Melo was better, Wade was better, etc. Like You go out of your way to take a shot when you can. If you're going to tell me you're not extremely biased, you're kidding yourself. That's all that "seeing something" thing is. A cheap way to basically say, "He's better because I said so". It's not unanimous. Maybe amongst Laker fans, but not to everyone. It varies from city to city. You'd have to be a moron to think your opinion on somebody is fact. Even I know what I say about LeBron has bias to it, just like a Magic fan would have bias against Dwight. So saying you "see something" is you saying "I like him more than him & I'd rather have him, despite them being really close in talent".
As for your little analogy, the same answer applies. If I love blondes (Yankees) & you love brunettes (Red Sox), you're going to think the blonde I think is a ten is more like an eight & your brunette is the baddest bitch on the planet & vice versa.
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 02, 2012, 05:43:01 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on May 02, 2012, 05:22:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: Chamillitary Click on May 02, 2012, 02:40:20 PM ---How you figure? He's stronger, can jump higher. If you were an inch taller than me, but I could jump twice as high as you & was stronger than you...whose more likely to box out & get up to grab a rebound? It's just pure common sense but somehow that doesn't even click to you. That's border line scary on your intelligence lol.
I swear, you'll say anything sometimes. A few months ago you wouldn't even have got me to say Bynum's better on offense. Now you're just saying, "Well, no. Bynum is just better in every facet of the game" lol. Unreal sometimes.
--- End quote ---
lmao...no way ur this basketball retarded. getting rebounds is not all about how tall u are and how high u can jump. if that were the case, kevin love wouldn't even be close to one of the best rebounders in the league. some of the greatest rebounders of all time barely had any hops. u think dennis rodman was as tall or could jump as high as deandre jordan? but who is the better rebounder? LOL...get a fuckin clue, son. not to mention, Bynum has a good 3 inches on Dwight. u dont even belong in these discussions with the points you attempt to make.
--- End quote ---
I mean, I clearly said boxing out. CLEARLY Dwight knows what he's doing, hence why he's always top of the league in rebounds. You're just being a selective reader trying to fight small details inside a main argument. Decent tactic, but I see through it, my boy.
When your entire argument is trying to say Bynum who averages less rebounds a game in his career than Dwight is a better rebounder because give "ideal situations" he would average more. That's nearly as idiotic as you trying to validate Bynum shooting 20% worse when the best scorer in the league isn't playing attracting defenses away & taking more shots.
--- End quote ---
Only a complete idiot would think boxing out has anything to do with how high u can jump lmao
Chamillitary Click:
So athleticism, leaping ability, strength, ability & skill to box out & height play absolutely no role in being a rebounder. They are irrelevant attributes that make no difference in the paint.
Please, all-mighty one, explain to me the art of rebounding. I thirst for your knowledge.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version