It's May 11, 2024, 01:37:27 AM
Total Members Voted: 6
no - i believe we shouldnt go to wardue to the contradiction in the reason the politics are giving us and because we have no right to tell another nation how to run itself politically and militarly - if we allow that to happen america will become like a dictator of the whole worldsecondly we shouldnt go to war because there has already been too much war in modern history. the great war, world war 2, vietnam war, korean war, gulf war etc. too much tradgey and horror has happened in these wars including the holocaust, schools full of children being destroyed, napalm being dropped on villages (how can anyone who has seen that picture of a little girl running down the street crying as her skins melts from the napalm america dropped), innocents killed, nuclear bombs dropped and the list goes on - it resolves nothing.and america has no right to bad mouth saddam as a dictator when they have supported plenty of bad dictators before.
Quote from: Rain - Anti-War on February 16, 2003, 10:15:26 PMno - i believe we shouldnt go to wardue to the contradiction in the reason the politics are giving us and because we have no right to tell another nation how to run itself politically and militarly - if we allow that to happen america will become like a dictator of the whole worldsecondly we shouldnt go to war because there has already been too much war in modern history. the great war, world war 2, vietnam war, korean war, gulf war etc. too much tradgey and horror has happened in these wars including the holocaust, schools full of children being destroyed, napalm being dropped on villages (how can anyone who has seen that picture of a little girl running down the street crying as her skins melts from the napalm america dropped), innocents killed, nuclear bombs dropped and the list goes on - it resolves nothing.and america has no right to bad mouth saddam as a dictator when they have supported plenty of bad dictators before. Thank You
Personally, I say no... we should not go to war... the reason we are going is to destroy Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction" ... the reason I quote that is because.. we have no proof of such weapons... secondly... we have weapons... and so why shouldn't other countries? I mean, yes, weapons are useless and cause nothing but more violence, but to go around and say "put your missiles away" is stupid.... when you threatening to point a missile right at them... -Bluey
If he doesn't have chem/bio weapons war is unnecessary. But ask yourself this, assume he does have them. Then if you had the option of doing something now, but instead waited for him to attack a neighbour country again and used those weapons, could you deal with it? Put another way, would you rather be proactive and stop a problem before it happens or would you be happy to wait for the problem to happen and then deal with the aftermath?