It's May 21, 2024, 07:15:27 AM
Dr Dre, who owned 50% of Death Row Records, received no royalty, publishing, or money when he left the label in 1995. Dre was reportedly entitled to earn over $60 million from the split. When asked if he was upset about not receiving any residuals, Dre famously said ‘You can’t put a price on a peaceful state of mind’.
Quote from: aerroc on January 06, 2013, 09:54:24 PMDr Dre, who owned 50% of Death Row Records, received no royalty, publishing, or money when he left the label in 1995. Dre was reportedly entitled to earn over $60 million from the split. When asked if he was upset about not receiving any residuals, Dre famously said ‘You can’t put a price on a peaceful state of mind’.so dre would rather let 60 million go then to deal wit suge??? lmao
15Dr Dre, who owned 50% of Death Row Records, received no royalty, publishing, or money when he left the label in 1995. Dre was reportedly entitled to earn over $60 million from the split. When asked if he was upset about not receiving any residuals, Dre famously said ‘You can’t put a price on a peaceful state of mind’.
Quote from: aerroc on January 06, 2013, 09:54:24 PM15Dr Dre, who owned 50% of Death Row Records, received no royalty, publishing, or money when he left the label in 1995. Dre was reportedly entitled to earn over $60 million from the split. When asked if he was upset about not receiving any residuals, Dre famously said ‘You can’t put a price on a peaceful state of mind’.We all know this in part wasn't true. Yeah, he didn't recieve royalties (which is why Dre sued Death Row in part), he does own his publishing (which is why whoever owns Death Row will have to get his permission to release any previously unreleased material by Dre from their vault, as part of the deal when he left back in 1996), and he did leave with money. It just wasn't the amount he was supposed to leave with and that was in part why he went to Jimmy to help him with forming Aftermath. They don't even have the right year when Dre left Death Row. 1995? Really? SMH!! LOL!
Quote from: sms130 on January 08, 2013, 05:00:38 PMQuote from: aerroc on January 06, 2013, 09:54:24 PM15Dr Dre, who owned 50% of Death Row Records, received no royalty, publishing, or money when he left the label in 1995. Dre was reportedly entitled to earn over $60 million from the split. When asked if he was upset about not receiving any residuals, Dre famously said ‘You can’t put a price on a peaceful state of mind’.We all know this in part wasn't true. Yeah, he didn't recieve royalties (which is why Dre sued Death Row in part), he does own his publishing (which is why whoever owns Death Row will have to get his permission to release any previously unreleased material by Dre from their vault, as part of the deal when he left back in 1996), and he did leave with money. It just wasn't the amount he was supposed to leave with and that was in part why he went to Jimmy to help him with forming Aftermath. They don't even have the right year when Dre left Death Row. 1995? Really? SMH!! LOL! Also the Eastcoast westcoast feud didn't start with that shooting, it started when Tim Dogg started hating and released Fuck Compton.Eastcoast started it westcoast dominated it, and in the end West and East been having troubles since the rise of the south and they haven't lost their grip because they make selll out music, have fake as hell motherfuckers, and don't cause any issues that you see with Eastcoast/Westcoast artist.
Interesting like you hating on the South now huh ? Sell out music huh, the west makes plenty .Didn't Wayne just say he hated NY and we the "SOUTH" had as many problems if not more than California .