It's May 25, 2024, 06:47:21 AM
I'm definitely not above believing that the Aurora, CO shooting was a set up false flag event in order to tighten gun laws. Seems like every day, life gets stranger and stranger.However, I got some beef with the article. I was cool with it until they started with that Illuminati shit. Also, demanding the victims take lie detector tests is silly since that evidence isn't usually admissible in court.The thing about actors pretending to be victims seems a bit far fetched too,, but probably the most plausible of them all since eyewitness accounts do differ greatly.Also, the whole thing about the media ignoring this "secret witness" is kinda silly too. When you got some person crying Illuminati and saying victims should take lie detector tests, its a bit ridiculous and I don't blame the media for not reporting it..........then again, the shit they do report is even more worthless so....
Okay, replying to the posters comment above, there are secret meetings that take place on an annual basis. In other words the minutes of the meetings are not reported which considering that the members present during the meeting are some of the most powerful people in the world and public servants suggests that they are there is a collusion between government and corporations underpinned further by the many lobbyists and special advisors to government who still have an active role in anothere profession. So what you said amounts to....."they" are benevolent people who only have my interests at heart and that mind set of your's is completely child like as you are viewing these people as your cuddle blanket or something which is a very bizarre notion to hold.
I just clarified that all we know is that the meetings do take place but that there is no disclosure of the content. I am now even more confused by the mindset of the person before though so you don't know the veracity of these statements you just enjoy life. All well and good so by you own admission your response is not based on any kind of empirical understanding about the topic. Which begs the question why offer a retort without foundation?
Quote from: virtuoso on March 29, 2013, 10:23:31 AMI just clarified that all we know is that the meetings do take place but that there is no disclosure of the content. I am now even more confused by the mindset of the person before though so you don't know the veracity of these statements you just enjoy life. All well and good so by you own admission your response is not based on any kind of empirical understanding about the topic. Which begs the question why offer a retort without foundation?Simply sating that neither story sounds 'real world' believable.As soon as I read something that sounds out of a crappy TV drama I cease to take the story seriously"there was an group of guys dressed differently at the other table. They made no effort to interact but when one man spoke out they quickly bundled him off. I never saw that friend again, and never spoke about that day. And I've waited 20 years to tell this story on a conspiracy theory website"