It's May 14, 2024, 07:42:56 PM
Quote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 09:01:10 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 07:53:16 PMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 05:54:01 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.Houston doesn't have to trade for Dwight, there really isn't anything to bargain. it would be dwight's choice, not houstonOK, so if Dwight wants a sign and trade, LA said they won't do one anyway, who will LA take back? Houston won't include Asik. Lin? You guys going to try for both and screw up your cap for 2014? You can have a second rounder.
Quote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 07:53:16 PMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 05:54:01 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.Houston doesn't have to trade for Dwight, there really isn't anything to bargain. it would be dwight's choice, not houston
Quote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 05:54:01 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.Houston doesn't have to trade for Dwight, there really isn't anything to bargain.
Quote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.
Why would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.
Quote from: Citizen-Y on June 30, 2013, 05:57:02 AMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 09:01:10 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 07:53:16 PMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 05:54:01 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.Houston doesn't have to trade for Dwight, there really isn't anything to bargain. it would be dwight's choice, not houstonOK, so if Dwight wants a sign and trade, LA said they won't do one anyway, who will LA take back? Houston won't include Asik. Lin? You guys going to try for both and screw up your cap for 2014? You can have a second rounder.they would do one, trust me....it's all bluff for now. in the end, if LA's options were him walking and sign-and-trade, were going for the sign-and-trade. if houston's options wer asik-parsons-beverly or dwight, yall going dwight. trust me.
Quote from: NIKCC on June 30, 2013, 11:48:20 AMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 30, 2013, 05:57:02 AMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 09:01:10 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 07:53:16 PMQuote from: NIKCC on June 29, 2013, 05:54:01 PMQuote from: Citizen-Y on June 29, 2013, 10:39:26 AMWhy would Houston agree to help reload LA? Parsons will not be involved in any sign and trade regardless of the team and Dwight is young enough to have another max deal after this.cuz they want dwight...and lol if you really believe yall wouldnt trade parsons for dwight.Houston doesn't have to trade for Dwight, there really isn't anything to bargain. it would be dwight's choice, not houstonOK, so if Dwight wants a sign and trade, LA said they won't do one anyway, who will LA take back? Houston won't include Asik. Lin? You guys going to try for both and screw up your cap for 2014? You can have a second rounder.they would do one, trust me....it's all bluff for now. in the end, if LA's options were him walking and sign-and-trade, were going for the sign-and-trade. if houston's options wer asik-parsons-beverly or dwight, yall going dwight. trust me.Have fun with Lin and Robinson. Maybe a second round pick.
he would definitely look like a bitch for quitting on 2 teams back-to-back....if he leaves without sign-and-trade, he will be the most hated man in LA AND lose a ton of money, it makes absolutely no sense.
Best Center in the league & it isn't even close.
he's not the bestMarc Gasol >Brook Lopez >Al Horford >Demarcus Cousins >Joaim Noah >Al Jefferson >he's the most glorified.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on July 01, 2013, 02:40:28 PMBest Center in the league & it isn't even close.Also a complete diva that's about to ditch out on his second team in a row. You know the league is in the shitter in terms of 5's when a guy that un-skilled is the best lol
Lol, he's so overhyped and overrated yet NIK sees it deeper than GM's making millions to put teams together; the same GM's clawing to get him. Mitch must just be doing the media a solid and pursuing Dwight. Even Kobe is making a plea for him to resign.It's mind blowing how retarded you come off when biased. You keep mentioning offense but Dwight averages more PPG than everyone you named in his career. Only your dumbass would view it where 13 > 18 because the 13 was scored with "better post moves". Style isn't efficiency. Dwight can put up his 20 on alley-oops, put backs and two hook shots and Horford can look like Tim Duncan out there with his footwork, but I'm taking Dwight's raw 20 over Al's finessed 14. He also averages more rebounds and blocks per game than anyone you named. Like you said, you "call it like you see it". You see it through a biased lens. I call it the way it is; straightforward and factual.