It's May 23, 2024, 08:29:08 AM
That's a misunderstanding,unless you don't see urang-utans as apes! It's like this,when adressing the evolution of apes and humans we get gibbons as the first split from the evolutionary way leading to us,followed by the urang-utan at about 9 million years ago,gorillas at about 6, and chimps and bonobos at ca. 5 milion years. From then on,all "apes" splitting off are "human",that is,above the level of chimpanzees.It's true we didn't evolve from the modern apes,like you said,but we are derived from more primitive apes.
Quote from: Z-Virus on May 08, 2003, 10:04:23 AMThat's a misunderstanding,unless you don't see urang-utans as apes! It's like this,when adressing the evolution of apes and humans we get gibbons as the first split from the evolutionary way leading to us,followed by the urang-utan at about 9 million years ago,gorillas at about 6, and chimps and bonobos at ca. 5 milion years. From then on,all "apes" splitting off are "human",that is,above the level of chimpanzees.It's true we didn't evolve from the modern apes,like you said,but we are derived from more primitive apes.That makes me wonder how humans will look in a couple million years if the Earth survives that long. We'll probably mutate and adapt to the horrible environmental problems and grow some wierd shit.
Hmm, Didn't Trauma prove about 3 months ago that evolution was impossible? The simple cell, which makes up all matter in the universe, dies if it is mutated in any form; it has hundreds of components, and if any of them aren't perfect, the cell dies. Therefore, the cell could have never mutated to it's present condition, therefore, MACROevolution is impossible. Evolution is the only subject in which science ignores ALL the evidence, and just grabs at straws, all evidence points to the organisms on earth being designed by something.