It's May 12, 2024, 11:38:11 PM
Lesbo=homo=satanism. While you personally believe there is nothing wrong with being a homo, you should understand that it stems from satanism, and this bull dyke is def down with the team.
pure evil
Quote from: NIKCC on October 24, 2013, 08:16:37 AMpure evilyou're the first person i know who's getting a boner over merkel
Quote from: Jack Trippa 3z company ho on October 24, 2013, 06:05:14 AMLesbo=homo=satanism. While you personally believe there is nothing wrong with being a homo, you should understand that it stems from satanism, and this bull dyke is def down with the team. Just assuming that everything you say actually happens I see a big difference between homosexuality as a sexual orientation and homosexual acts performed by straight men as a rite of passage. Appels and Oranges imo.Plus how old are satanic cults really? I don't see how a certain behavior that's existing in so many species and surely not only in the last 6000 years could possibly stem from satanism. Regardless of wether they use it as a tool of domination or whatever else motives satanists have.
The guy is a paranoid fucking nut case.
Being homo is either a result of sexual abuse or brainwash in humans. Animals aren't knowingly homo...ostriches will try to hump humans, dogs will hump legs etc. Sex is very primal to an animal and will hump anything to scratch that itch.
Quote from: Jack Trippa 3z company ho on October 24, 2013, 10:53:53 AMBeing homo is either a result of sexual abuse or brainwash in humans. Animals aren't knowingly homo...ostriches will try to hump humans, dogs will hump legs etc. Sex is very primal to an animal and will hump anything to scratch that itch. Who the fuck are you and what info do you have that backs this statement? You are so far lost in your own world it makes me laugh. Also there are plenty of homosexual behaviors in animalshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
Quote from: Fraxxx on October 24, 2013, 07:26:58 AMQuote from: Jack Trippa 3z company ho on October 24, 2013, 06:05:14 AMLesbo=homo=satanism. While you personally believe there is nothing wrong with being a homo, you should understand that it stems from satanism, and this bull dyke is def down with the team. Just assuming that everything you say actually happens I see a big difference between homosexuality as a sexual orientation and homosexual acts performed by straight men as a rite of passage. Appels and Oranges imo.Plus how old are satanic cults really? I don't see how a certain behavior that's existing in so many species and surely not only in the last 6000 years could possibly stem from satanism. Regardless of wether they use it as a tool of domination or whatever else motives satanists have.Props for the distinction there, and I can respect that. Being homo is either a result of sexual abuse or brainwash in humans. Animals aren't knowingly homo...ostriches will try to hump humans, dogs will hump legs etc. Sex is very primal to an animal and will hump anything to scratch that itch.
Quote from: Jack Trippa 3z company ho on October 24, 2013, 10:53:53 AMQuote from: Fraxxx on October 24, 2013, 07:26:58 AMQuote from: Jack Trippa 3z company ho on October 24, 2013, 06:05:14 AMLesbo=homo=satanism. While you personally believe there is nothing wrong with being a homo, you should understand that it stems from satanism, and this bull dyke is def down with the team. Just assuming that everything you say actually happens I see a big difference between homosexuality as a sexual orientation and homosexual acts performed by straight men as a rite of passage. Appels and Oranges imo.Plus how old are satanic cults really? I don't see how a certain behavior that's existing in so many species and surely not only in the last 6000 years could possibly stem from satanism. Regardless of wether they use it as a tool of domination or whatever else motives satanists have.Props for the distinction there, and I can respect that. Being homo is either a result of sexual abuse or brainwash in humans. Animals aren't knowingly homo...ostriches will try to hump humans, dogs will hump legs etc. Sex is very primal to an animal and will hump anything to scratch that itch.Completley disagree. But I don't think that necessairly has to be discussed right now.I got one question, though. I guess your view on homosexuality has a moral aspect, meaning that you would judge h. in categories of 'right' or 'wrong', which to me would appear consistent with your other views. Correct me, if I'm wrong, it's just an assumption, after all.I wondered how I would argue to convince someone with your views that I'm right. Cause if there were new studies which irrefutably proved your theory, I would have to (reluctantly) admit that h. is no normal variation of the standart behavior. That would piss me off but it wouldn't contradict my overall belief system. So my question is what would be the requirements and sufficient enough proof to theoretically change your opinion on that topic? Cause I can't see very much room for discussion there (and as we already know: Don't fight battles that you can't win. )
Quote from: Fraxxx on October 24, 2013, 05:13:02 PMCompletley disagree. But I don't think that necessairly has to be discussed right now.I got one question, though. I guess your view on homosexuality has a moral aspect, meaning that you would judge h. in categories of 'right' or 'wrong', which to me would appear consistent with your other views. Correct me, if I'm wrong, it's just an assumption, after all.I wondered how I would argue to convince someone with your views that I'm right. Cause if there were new studies which irrefutably proved your theory, I would have to (reluctantly) admit that h. is no normal variation of the standart behavior. That would piss me off but it wouldn't contradict my overall belief system. So my question is what would be the requirements and sufficient enough proof to theoretically change your opinion on that topic? Cause I can't see very much room for discussion there (and as we already know: Don't fight battles that you can't win. )Being homo and propagating homo, and thinking that accepting homo is progressive...that's brainwash. If male crickets fuck each other, and that makes you think pounding a mans ass is justified...do your thing. I know that satanists advocate it because it is in opposition to God and morality. Many people don't believe in morality. When they die they're gonna get evaluated and finally understand that dookie dick is disgusting and wrong. Accepting ass pounders is not chic and sophisticated...it's disgusting. Peace
Completley disagree. But I don't think that necessairly has to be discussed right now.I got one question, though. I guess your view on homosexuality has a moral aspect, meaning that you would judge h. in categories of 'right' or 'wrong', which to me would appear consistent with your other views. Correct me, if I'm wrong, it's just an assumption, after all.I wondered how I would argue to convince someone with your views that I'm right. Cause if there were new studies which irrefutably proved your theory, I would have to (reluctantly) admit that h. is no normal variation of the standart behavior. That would piss me off but it wouldn't contradict my overall belief system. So my question is what would be the requirements and sufficient enough proof to theoretically change your opinion on that topic? Cause I can't see very much room for discussion there (and as we already know: Don't fight battles that you can't win. )