It's May 13, 2024, 01:33:34 AM
How there is 1 snivelling brat in the world, anywhere, that opposes this war, I will never know. I say after this, hell, lets go after the next tyrannt, lets go ahead and rid the world of the people who in the 21st century, still refuse to treat their citizens like decent human beings.
Quote from: Irish_thug_wannabe on March 18, 2003, 01:33:58 PM This war has no aim but to make you feel safer. That is why im against war.I'm trying to figure out what the hell you mean. What else reason is there to fight a war? If it'll make your country safer, then you are obliged, for the welfare of your citizens, to fight the war. By your own words you're wrong.Second, there are plenty of reasons for a war. Do you not realize that Saadam Hussein is a bad man? lol, I mean I won't even get into what he's done in the past, but do you think the Iraqi people are going to be MAD when we liberate them and let them lead what life they want? Third, maybe you don't realize it, or haven't been paying attention, but 12 years ago, we were at war with Iraq. A U.N. Sanctioned war. The U.N. helped us END the war, and draw up a cease fire, which said that Saadam Hussein had to, as a term of the cease fire, destroy all of his weapons of mass destruction. We're still finding weapons 12 years later, when he lets the 100's of inspectors who have been combing his country for 12 years find one. He shoots at U.S. planes in the sky. He applauded the attacks on us on 9-11-01. He's breached the terms of the cease fire agreement... we have an agreement from the U.N., a resolution stating that if he hadn't disarmed, by DECEMBER, that action would be taken against him. That was the deadline. 12 years! 12 years this guy has been in breach of a cease-fire agreement. In October of last year, the U.S. Congress passed a resolution giving the president the power to use military force against Iraq. Today, 30 countries stand with us supporting this war, and 70% of americans support it.Tony Blair - Do you honestly think that Tony Blair would risk his entire political career just to kiss Bush's ass? Why? If he's no longer a politician, his connection to Bush would be useless. I'll tell you why Blair supports this war; it's because he knows that the NEXT time a terrorist wants a bomb, he could probably get one from Bagdad. Do any of you deny that? Saadam would gladly give materials to terrorists. The next time something is bombed, it might not be the U.S. It might be the good people of Britain. It's the best thing for PEACE loving people everywhere, to get rid of a tyrannt, who has been making HIS LIFE MISSION the infliction of pain on his OWN PEOPLE! You know, it's a sad world. In a perfect, god loving world, there would be no war. Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world. It's flawed, and it's a road in which good-hearted peaceloving people would be rutlessly taken advantage of, if they did not arm and protect themselves. Look at the people in Iraq. They have no guns, they have no way to defend themselves, and look at the asshole running their country. Should we, as free humans, let him continue, or should we interupt, the ONLY way we can? For years we've tried to Change Saadam, and the only option left, after 12 years, is to kill him, for the good of his country, for the safety of the rest of the world, and Tony Blair, the prime Minister of Australia, the U.S. Government, and several other leaders around the world realize this. Blair is a hero, he's risking his entire career to support something he thinks is right, and yall are making him out to be an asshole for it.
This war has no aim but to make you feel safer. That is why im against war.
welcome to the club of nazis.
Ok, so if the majority of the UN disagrees with you, you will go ahead and do what you think is right, but the majority thinks is wrong?You say you are attacking Iraq because they are clearly disregarding the UN. And what are your country doing? Clearly disregarding the UN.I hate the way polititians from britain and the US are trying to blame this on the french. They said "at this time" we would veto any proposal sanctioning war. And "at that time" disarming was in progress and there was and still is no need for war. "At that time" more weapons had been disarmed than in the whole of the gulf war.Bringing you back to another point, saying attacking Iraq is ok if it means americans are a bit safer. Are you suggesting that american, or western lives for some reason weigh more than the lives you have taken tonight and will continue to do in the coming days?The images on tv tonighht were horrible. They were as,if not more, disturbing as the images of 911. I felt myself, and I'm not the slightest bit terrorist minded, that the perpetrators of the bomb raids on iraq should be brought to justice. Imagine what an already unstable person will think seeing those pictures. I doubt it'll be too long till western skys will be burning again. God help all those in iraq tonight.RIP those who died aimlessly in the air raids, soldiers, men women and children.RIP to the servicemen who died aimlessly for the allied forces.After seeing those images tonight, who can still be in favour of war?