Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Man's best friend
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 01:57:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
Why is that a low Fraxxx. If nobody gets hurt in the process and they don't bother you with it, who cares.
Or do we have got a norm? And if so, who decides these norms?
And how can they change?
That is a philosophical question my friend.
--- End quote ---
No it's not. You really want me to argue against zoophilia to the point where you can say "Hah, and the same goes for hoomooes!" (preferably in a British accent)? If you can't come up with something solid yourself I can't help you. I am against zoophilia and so are you, I presume. So I don't see the benefit in wasting my time on discussing it (Cause writing these textes is time-consuming, after all. For me, anyway). If someone truly would be in favor of it, I might argue against it. But you're just playing Devil's Advocate here to turn this around on me. Don't think so. Also wouldn't work :) The burden of proof is on you. Most basic scientific principle there is.
Aladin:
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 28, 2014, 04:05:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 01:57:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
Why is that a low Fraxxx. If nobody gets hurt in the process and they don't bother you with it, who cares.
Or do we have got a norm? And if so, who decides these norms?
And how can they change?
That is a philosophical question my friend.
--- End quote ---
No it's not. You really want me to argue against zoophilia to the point where you can say "Hah, and the same goes for hoomooes!" (preferably in a British accent)? If you can't come up with something solid yourself I can't help you. I am against zoophilia and so are you, I presume. So I don't see the benefit in wasting my time on discussing it (Cause writing these textes is time-consuming, after all. For me, anyway). If someone truly would be in favor of it, I might argue against it. But you're just playing Devil's Advocate here to turn this around on me. Don't think so. Also wouldn't work :) The burden of proof is on you. Most basic scientific principle there is.
--- End quote ---
So it is a challenge!
oke. let me get my mind and time straight and I give you mine point of view.
By the way, although I agree with some of the other posters on the basis that we have the same religious point of view.
I don't necessary agree with them the way they attack you for not being spirtual.
I do value your input from your perspective. And respect your opinion.
KrazySumwhat:
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 11:00:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: KrazySumwhat on January 27, 2014, 05:10:56 AM --- I could never buy/own a dog. All them porno's i seen would make it fucked up.
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you watched many pornos involving dogs?
--- End quote ---
Yep.
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 04:30:43 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 28, 2014, 04:05:10 AM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 28, 2014, 01:57:51 AM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
Why is that a low Fraxxx. If nobody gets hurt in the process and they don't bother you with it, who cares.
Or do we have got a norm? And if so, who decides these norms?
And how can they change?
That is a philosophical question my friend.
--- End quote ---
No it's not. You really want me to argue against zoophilia to the point where you can say "Hah, and the same goes for hoomooes!" (preferably in a British accent)? If you can't come up with something solid yourself I can't help you. I am against zoophilia and so are you, I presume. So I don't see the benefit in wasting my time on discussing it (Cause writing these textes is time-consuming, after all. For me, anyway). If someone truly would be in favor of it, I might argue against it. But you're just playing Devil's Advocate here to turn this around on me. Don't think so. Also wouldn't work :) The burden of proof is on you. Most basic scientific principle there is.
--- End quote ---
So it is a challenge!
oke. let me get my mind and time straight and I give you mine point of view.
By the way, although I agree with some of the other posters on the basis that we have the same religious point of view.
I don't necessary agree with them the way they attack you for not being spirtual.
I do value your input from your perspective. And respect your opinion.
--- End quote ---
Okay, then. Now I'm expecting something good. :)
https://www.youtube.com/v/hCyl2XqGjlI
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Mr. Bones on January 26, 2014, 02:56:34 PM ---dogs are wack....who wants to walk a dog in the freezing cold or warm ass summer weather? and now many cities expect you to PICK UP IT'S POOP?
Get the fuck outta here.....go get a cat.
--- End quote ---
real fuckin spit tho
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version