Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Man's best friend
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 06:08:28 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 29, 2014, 04:38:42 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 02:04:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 12:53:40 PM ---
--- Quote from: Aladin on January 27, 2014, 12:04:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 27, 2014, 11:00:32 AM ---
--- Quote from: KrazySumwhat on January 27, 2014, 05:10:56 AM --- I could never buy/own a dog. All them porno's i seen would make it fucked up.
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you watched many pornos involving dogs?
--- End quote ---
Soo... you mean to say that you are surprised about that (you know we are talking about Krazy, right?)
--- End quote ---
Well... I kind of... try to see the best in people and all that... I mean... dogs? That's a new low! :-\
--- End quote ---
so watching bestiality is low, but gay porn is not? GOT U
--- End quote ---
If you now can also at least try to tell me HOW exactly you got me, I will gladly destroy your attempt to do so. *wink*
--- End quote ---
WHY ARE U JUDGING PEOPLE WHO ENJOY BESTIALITY (KRAZY) IF IT DOESN'T HURT ANY1?
ACCORDING TO YOU, "THERE IS NO LOGICAL REASON"
--- End quote ---
I don't know how you come to this conclusion. Repeat it as often as you want but I still never made a case neither for nor against zoophilia. I doubted that the percentage of women that are happy with accidentally being mounted by a dog would be very high.
But that's similar to your claim I would have said 'natural' equaled 'acceptable'. Since I don't think that you're stupid, I must assume that you do this on purpose.
Sccit:
DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THERE IS NO LOGICAL ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT CAUSES NO ONE ANY HARM?
Fraxxx:
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 08:20:45 PM ---DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THERE IS NO LOGICAL ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT CAUSES NO ONE ANY HARM?
--- End quote ---
That was one point, yes. Consent was another one. Why would you assume that a such a vast majority of interspecies sexual encounters met the requirements that allowed to make the same point for zoophilia in principle.
And why the hell are we argueing this in the first place? Like I said before:
"So if you want someone to advocate the legalization of sex with animals you gotta go look somewhere else. It doesn't change the fact that you can't come up with anything reasonable against homosexuality in particular one bit."
Sccit:
--- Quote from: Fraxxx on January 29, 2014, 08:52:15 PM ---
--- Quote from: NIKCC on January 29, 2014, 08:20:45 PM ---DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THERE IS NO LOGICAL ARGUMENT AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT CAUSES NO ONE ANY HARM?
--- End quote ---
That was one point, yes. Consent was another one. Why would you assume that a such a vast majority of interspecies sexual encounters met the requirements that allowed to make the same point for zoophilia in principle.
And why the hell are we argueing this in the first place? Like I said before:
"So if you want someone to advocate the legalization of sex with animals you gotta go look somewhere else. It doesn't change the fact that you can't come up with anything reasonable against homosexuality in particular one bit."
--- End quote ---
thats what i'm sayin, dogs consent to it all the time and theres no harm in it..."you cant come up with a reasonable argument against it"...in essence, you agree that it's okay for dogs to fuck human pussu. dont worry, i'm not here to judge.
Sikotic™:
dog pussy is tight
my chihuahuas are eternal.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version