It's May 07, 2024, 09:01:39 PM
Kawhi Leonard ain't shit without Duncan around, look at last night's game
Quote from: M Dogg™ on January 26, 2016, 12:02:29 PMQuote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 11:20:50 AMQuote from: hack benjamin on January 26, 2016, 11:07:34 AMYou're right scxit, Lebron is the best SF. So he wouldn't be 2nd.currently durant>kawhi>lebron and that goes witout sayinThat's not off. Look at all my past post over the last 5 years. Sccit got mad at me at the time, but I said then, LeBron's game doesn't allow him to be as good as he is for long. I think Kawhi is way better than LeBron, and Durant is neck and neck with him. So with that said, this is LeBron's swan song as a top player. he has 2, maybe 3 more years in this upper level, and then plain crash. The thing is, he doesn't have a team to beat the Warriors.Quote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 11:21:18 AMQuote from: M Dogg™ on January 26, 2016, 11:08:20 AMQuote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 10:36:27 AMlebron is not even the 2nd best small forward in the league right now, so we can kill that off-top.....and the warriors are nice, but they not as good as their record indicates. why, u ask? because the level of play in the nba is at an all-time low. you take this warrior team and put them in the 80s/90s, and they have at least 15 losses by now, which is good, but not all-time great....so yea, they most likely heading for another 1, but lets kill that noise about them being one of the greatest teams ever....until they win at least 3 straight, that is.Never said they were one of the greatest ever. They couldn't hang with the big men of the 80's or 90's. But, the level of dominance over who they are playing is second to none. They are so much better than everyone else in the league it's not funny.cuz the league sucks...thats what im sayin. Doesn't matter if the league sucks. It goes to my arguments I've always used, you can only be judged against the people you go against. LeBron dominated in an era that was not very good, but it doesn't take away that he dominated scrubs. The Lakers in the 80's were always in the finals because the west in the 80's was horrible. You can only be judged by the talent around you. Could the 2016 Warriors beat the 1996 Bulls, I don't think so. But are the 2016 Warriors the most dominate team in 2016, yes and it's not even close. The league may suck, but the Warriors still have to win. Two years ago I got frustrated because the league sucked and no one wanted to step up, and the Spurs won it all. I was saying it then, no one wanted to be great. Now the Warriors have filled that role. They are so driven in a league of everyone going on neutral. I don't care if the rest of the league sucks, I love that the Warriors are this good.Please note, due to the Raiders moving talk, I have listened to a lot of Bay Area sports radio online... LOL... and I have drank the Kool-Aid. At the same time, I didn't believe it until I saw they murder the Spurs. I don't doubt that the warriors are an excellent team .. What I'm saying is that they're made to look greater than they are by the level of competition around.
Quote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 11:20:50 AMQuote from: hack benjamin on January 26, 2016, 11:07:34 AMYou're right scxit, Lebron is the best SF. So he wouldn't be 2nd.currently durant>kawhi>lebron and that goes witout sayinThat's not off. Look at all my past post over the last 5 years. Sccit got mad at me at the time, but I said then, LeBron's game doesn't allow him to be as good as he is for long. I think Kawhi is way better than LeBron, and Durant is neck and neck with him. So with that said, this is LeBron's swan song as a top player. he has 2, maybe 3 more years in this upper level, and then plain crash. The thing is, he doesn't have a team to beat the Warriors.Quote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 11:21:18 AMQuote from: M Dogg™ on January 26, 2016, 11:08:20 AMQuote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 10:36:27 AMlebron is not even the 2nd best small forward in the league right now, so we can kill that off-top.....and the warriors are nice, but they not as good as their record indicates. why, u ask? because the level of play in the nba is at an all-time low. you take this warrior team and put them in the 80s/90s, and they have at least 15 losses by now, which is good, but not all-time great....so yea, they most likely heading for another 1, but lets kill that noise about them being one of the greatest teams ever....until they win at least 3 straight, that is.Never said they were one of the greatest ever. They couldn't hang with the big men of the 80's or 90's. But, the level of dominance over who they are playing is second to none. They are so much better than everyone else in the league it's not funny.cuz the league sucks...thats what im sayin. Doesn't matter if the league sucks. It goes to my arguments I've always used, you can only be judged against the people you go against. LeBron dominated in an era that was not very good, but it doesn't take away that he dominated scrubs. The Lakers in the 80's were always in the finals because the west in the 80's was horrible. You can only be judged by the talent around you. Could the 2016 Warriors beat the 1996 Bulls, I don't think so. But are the 2016 Warriors the most dominate team in 2016, yes and it's not even close. The league may suck, but the Warriors still have to win. Two years ago I got frustrated because the league sucked and no one wanted to step up, and the Spurs won it all. I was saying it then, no one wanted to be great. Now the Warriors have filled that role. They are so driven in a league of everyone going on neutral. I don't care if the rest of the league sucks, I love that the Warriors are this good.Please note, due to the Raiders moving talk, I have listened to a lot of Bay Area sports radio online... LOL... and I have drank the Kool-Aid. At the same time, I didn't believe it until I saw they murder the Spurs.
Quote from: hack benjamin on January 26, 2016, 11:07:34 AMYou're right scxit, Lebron is the best SF. So he wouldn't be 2nd.currently durant>kawhi>lebron and that goes witout sayin
You're right scxit, Lebron is the best SF. So he wouldn't be 2nd.
Quote from: M Dogg™ on January 26, 2016, 11:08:20 AMQuote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 10:36:27 AMlebron is not even the 2nd best small forward in the league right now, so we can kill that off-top.....and the warriors are nice, but they not as good as their record indicates. why, u ask? because the level of play in the nba is at an all-time low. you take this warrior team and put them in the 80s/90s, and they have at least 15 losses by now, which is good, but not all-time great....so yea, they most likely heading for another 1, but lets kill that noise about them being one of the greatest teams ever....until they win at least 3 straight, that is.Never said they were one of the greatest ever. They couldn't hang with the big men of the 80's or 90's. But, the level of dominance over who they are playing is second to none. They are so much better than everyone else in the league it's not funny.cuz the league sucks...thats what im sayin.
Quote from: Sccit on January 26, 2016, 10:36:27 AMlebron is not even the 2nd best small forward in the league right now, so we can kill that off-top.....and the warriors are nice, but they not as good as their record indicates. why, u ask? because the level of play in the nba is at an all-time low. you take this warrior team and put them in the 80s/90s, and they have at least 15 losses by now, which is good, but not all-time great....so yea, they most likely heading for another 1, but lets kill that noise about them being one of the greatest teams ever....until they win at least 3 straight, that is.Never said they were one of the greatest ever. They couldn't hang with the big men of the 80's or 90's. But, the level of dominance over who they are playing is second to none. They are so much better than everyone else in the league it's not funny.
lebron is not even the 2nd best small forward in the league right now, so we can kill that off-top.....and the warriors are nice, but they not as good as their record indicates. why, u ask? because the level of play in the nba is at an all-time low. you take this warrior team and put them in the 80s/90s, and they have at least 15 losses by now, which is good, but not all-time great....so yea, they most likely heading for another 1, but lets kill that noise about them being one of the greatest teams ever....until they win at least 3 straight, that is.
I have never seen domination like this, ever. I saw the 1996 Bulls, but this is on another level. All LeBron being top 5 talk is over. He is now a footnote squeezed between Kobe and Curry. I'm now a full on believer.
LeBron coaching the defense with the IQ of Jesus Christ himself, was why Steph didn't produce.Back to back Finals against the Cavs, he didn't play up to his typical par. That's a sick game plan by the greatest player in the sport.
lmao, so the new argument is getting away from achievements as Bron achieves more & more & change the narrative to who would beat who in the past? lol. Okay.
hilarious