Responding to Diddy Verdict and NO BAIL

[Sccit]

Why do you keep focusing on cassie? There were more victims during the trial. Like I said, you can take her out of the equation if you want and you still have a strong case where Diddy could have been shown guilty.

 Some kid said that Diddy wasn't charged with slapping Cassie around. The DV was used to prove the coercion charge that goes along with the sex trafficking. Meaning, if she didn't do the freak offs, she would be beaten, or that she would be beaten and forced to do the freak offs. The hotel incident was because she tried to leave and didn't want to do the freak off. That kid doesn't even understand the context in which the DV was brought it. It's not because this is or isn't a DV case, it's to show coercian.

mostly hearsay

not real hard evidence

[BIGWORM]

There are Rumors that He beat her in the hotel because she went to OVO fest and fucked DRAKE. Puffy never slapped out Drake because of the "zero to 100 beat" it was due the the subliminals in the song below allegedly not in these exact words but "puffy calling that he wants Cassie back but she is high getting passed around an ect" there are bad boy subliminals all over this track

[b.laden]

I made a mistake in a prior post. It wasn't KK, it was Capricorn Clark, the one who was down with DR.

Here's her talking about the kidnapping.
You can tell it happened because the defense didn't attack her about it.
DIDDY TRIAL: CAPRICORN CLARK BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8_Wmu1qGEs?si=4JugrB5zP0xMERuq

DIDDY TRIAL: CAPRICORN CLARK CROSS EXAMINATION TESTIMONY!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIdnjBQLB0A?si=YEcBA_cxml-m8QVU

you know a trial need real evidence not a YouTube video . this is not a movie .everybody can tell anything  and create a YouTube video.
and half the world population have a weird sexual life . do you think they should be in prison ? 

[abusive]

you know a trial need real evidence not a YouTube video . this is not a movie .everybody can tell anything  and create a YouTube video.
and half the world population have a weird sexual life . do you think they should be in prison ?

This is actual testimony from the trial that was read by this woman. Her source is the primary news source that everyone has been using form the trial.

The trial isn't just about sex. There was also violence, kidnapping, bribery, arson, extortion, drugs etc. the fact that you think it's just about sex just shows that you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.

Ask @Scchit If he's checked out ANY of the testimony of this case either read aloud, or read the transcripts, gone over the diddy indictment paperwork and subsequent charges and changes, the lil rod lawsuit, the first rico case by Kurt Burrows, the Johnathon Oddi interrogation or anything pertaining to Diddy and these various allegations over the years.

No, what he's done is latch onto the salacious headlines about freak offs, baby oil and semen and drawn his conclusions on this trial based on that. Then he wants to call the people who have actually studied this case "conspiracy theorist" to cover up for his ignorance, just like he always does. Nasty work!

[Sccit]

This is actual testimony from the trial that was read by this woman. Her source is the primary news source that everyone has been using form the trial.

The trial isn't just about sex. There was also violence, kidnapping, bribery, arson, extortion, drugs etc. the fact that you think it's just about sex just shows that you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.

Ask @Scchit If he's checked out ANY of the testimony of this case either read aloud, or read the transcripts, gone over the diddy indictment paperwork and subsequent charges and changes, the lil rod lawsuit, the first rico case by Kurt Burrows, the Johnathon Oddi interrogation or anything pertaining to Diddy and these various allegations over the years.

No, what he's done is latch onto the salacious headlines about freak offs, baby oil and semen and drawn his conclusions on this trial based on that. Then he wants to call the people who have actually studied this case "conspiracy theorist" to cover up for his ignorance, just like he always does. Nasty work!

there was no conviction on any of that shit

u are a prototypical conspiracy theorist

and thats comin from someone who thought puffy would do football numbers

[abusive]

there was no conviction on any of that shit

u are a prototypical conspiracy theorist

and thats comin from someone who thought puffy would do football numbers

^This guy.

So since he wasn't convicted on drugs, there was no drug use? Even though Diddy's drug guy was charged and snitched on diddy?

[Sccit]

^This guy.

So since he wasn't convicted on drugs, there was no drug use? Even though Diddy's drug guy was charged and snitched on diddy?

nobody cares bout drugs


he wasn't convicted of kidnapping, trafficking etc.

pretty sure the jury heard more and saw more evidence than u

[abusive]

nobody cares bout drugs


he wasn't convicted of kidnapping, trafficking etc.

pretty sure the jury heard more and saw more evidence than u

No one said he was convicted of it. The point was it was presented in the court so that means the case was more than just sex. That doesn't make me a conspiracy theorist for pointing that out.  Most of what the jurors heard is public . You clearly didn't read or listen to any of the testimony or cross examination or closing statements or any of the filing s surrounding this case and shouldn't be trying to speak down to someone who did.

[Sccit]

No one said he was convicted of it. The point was it was presented in the court so that means the case was more than just sex. That doesn't make me a conspiracy theorist for pointing that out.  Most of what the jurors heard is public . You clearly didn't read or listen to any of the testimony or cross examination or closing statements or any of the filing s surrounding this case and shouldn't be trying to speak down to someone who did.

so again

why wasn't he convicted??

that means it was all hearsay .. because there was not enough evidence to prove the claims

[abusive]

so again

why wasn't he convicted??

that means it was all hearsay .. because there was not enough evidence to prove the claims

I'm done with you. 

[Sccit]

I'm done with you. 

 











 

[TraceOneInfinite]

lol first of all.. the issue with will smith is that his wife is the one who
was having an affair .. with the friend of her son .... a 20 year old ... then went on TV to expose it and make will look like a total hoe


as for abusive, hes just talking more of his typical conspiracy theory shit ..... like u said, cassie stayed with puffy for over a decade through all this .. because she enjoyed the drugs, the sex, and although puffy mighta took it too far by slapping her around, those are domestic disputes .... not what he was being charged with

the biggest problem for me is that he's rubbing another man's cum on his nipples .... all that other stuff i thought was just regular celebrity sex party shit... the stuff hollywood is made of

First, the Will Smith thing.  His wife cheated on him.  Big fucking deal.  I don't see anything there.  To me, there are only two issues.  How did two ol school 80's and 90's hiphop icons raise a trans kid?  That's issue number 1.  Then issue number 2, slapping Chris Rock.  Those two I understand—but if you see all the crazy clickbait and accusations on Will Smith you would think the guy is Jeffrey Epstein (and even Jeffery Epstein I think is a hoax, but just using the name to make a point)

Second, the Puffy thing.  I wouldn't be 100% sure he did the gay nipples thing you heard.  And even if he did what was the context and motivations.  To me, I think Puffy just going way overboard trying to get so freaky that he kind of lost his mind and forgot what being a G was all about back when he used to be friends with Pac.  I don't think the intent was to be gay, the reason I say that is because wasn't there always some girl involved so it was some type of orgie shit.  But either way, still nothing he's done sounds illegal because it still all comes back to the question... what were the people doing there anyway??   And can't they accept responsibility for going there with their two feet?  He didn't drag them there kicking and screaming which is what kidnapping meant in the 80's when people had common sense.  Kidnapping meant when you take someone kicking and screaming from their location to your location.  Not, that you were like "oh cool I want to go hang with Puffy at his cool celeb parties, sounds like fun" and then when the money and fun dries up later and you ain't looking or feeling as good as you once did now you wanna take legal action?  Or you didn't get all you wanted out of him?

[b.laden]

MR Abusive ..how can a multimillionaire kidnapp some girls from New York when he can have legally the most beautiful girls from columbia, Russia or wherever  . some ladies will cross the world just to talk to gay ass diddy
and do you know what kidnapping involve  ? at least 15 years in prison . i dont think Diddy so stupid to even have connections  to any gangsters who kidnapp some girls
human trafficking  is for street gangsters, thugs from the projects  not a multimillionaire
and there s a big difference between havin connections in some human trafficking groups and put in  work in the human trafficking . thats the job of  the judges to evaluate

[Sccit]

First, the Will Smith thing.  His wife cheated on him.  Big fucking deal.  I don't see anything there.  To me, there are only two issues.  How did two ol school 80's and 90's hiphop icons raise a trans kid?  That's issue number 1.  Then issue number 2, slapping Chris Rock.  Those two I understand—but if you see all the crazy clickbait and accusations on Will Smith you would think the guy is Jeffrey Epstein (and even Jeffery Epstein I think is a hoax, but just using the name to make a point)

Second, the Puffy thing.  I wouldn't be 100% sure he did the gay nipples thing you heard.  And even if he did what was the context and motivations.  To me, I think Puffy just going way overboard trying to get so freaky that he kind of lost his mind and forgot what being a G was all about back when he used to be friends with Pac.  I don't think the intent was to be gay, the reason I say that is because wasn't there always some girl involved so it was some type of orgie shit.  But either way, still nothing he's done sounds illegal because it still all comes back to the question... what were the people doing there anyway??   And can't they accept responsibility for going there with their two feet?  He didn't drag them there kicking and screaming which is what kidnapping meant in the 80's when people had common sense.  Kidnapping meant when you take someone kicking and screaming from their location to your location.  Not, that you were like "oh cool I want to go hang with Puffy at his cool celeb parties, sounds like fun" and then when the money and fun dries up later and you ain't looking or feeling as good as you once did now you wanna take legal action?  Or you didn't get all you wanted out of him?

regarding will smith

it all goes hand in hand ... it's the radical liberal "the woman wears the pants in the relationship" mindset..  jada constantly emasculates will smith on her show by doing slick things like talking about how she was fucking the 20 year old friend of their son, how she is the head of the household, how she would rather be married to pac than will smith etc. etc..... why do u think their kids turned out that way? just a very strange family dynamic through n through.. and it all starts with jada's demonic level feminism.



and regarding puff... i duno, i wasn't there. but a lot of it is definitely hearsay, so u never know.

[TraceOneInfinite]

MR Abusive ..how can a multimillionaire kidnapp some girls from New York when he can have legally the most beautiful girls from columbia, Russia or wherever  . some ladies will cross the world just to talk to gay ass diddy
and do you know what kidnapping involve  ? at least 15 years in prison . i dont think Diddy so stupid to even have connections  to any gangsters who kidnapp some girls
human trafficking  is for street gangsters, thugs from the projects  not a multimillionaire
and there s a big difference between havin connections in some human trafficking groups and put in  work in the human trafficking . thats the job of  the judges to evaluate

yes, thank you.. people are ridiculous the way they use these words like "kidnapping" so loosely just for shock value and click bait