Mike Epps x Ice Cube Podcast - Episode #01 (Dr. Dre)

[WCEric]

I haven't discussed this with my guys yet.

My guys....but really though, why does it matter whether the Earth is flat or not? Grey aliens exist, wearable realistic holograms exist, ten times more important than flat Earth and name calling.

[mtbsm]

so dre says two projects.

one is clae
one is unknown

stat quo in recent 3rd Verse said he was at Dre's house and heard new Dre, 10-12 tracks I think he said... not sure number.. but said heard track after track after track and it was one after another .. said Dre's best work EVER

is that the project?

[O.E.800]

My guys....but really though, why does it matter whether the Earth is flat or not? Grey aliens exist, wearable realistic holograms exist, ten times more important than flat Earth and name calling.

Uh.... I love how you dismiss one claim as unimportant, then assert two bigger claims with less evidence behind them lol. "Ten times more important" only holds if those claims are actually true dude. And importance doesn't count as evidence. It's just a typical way of changing the subject.

For everyday life, it mostly doesn't matter whether the Earth is flat or not. Most people never need the Earth's shape to get through a day. GPS, satellite communications, long-haul flight routes, and weather forecasting do rely on the globe model, but morons don't have to know that. What matters is how a person decides what's true. Flat Earth is a useful test case precisely because it's so easy to check dude: anyone can do the tests from the last answer. If someone's way of evaluating claims leads them to a conclusion that a stopwatch and a beach can disprove, the same method will mislead them on claims that are harder to check like medical, financial, and political.

I'm not going to dive into this grey alien stuff lol, suffice to say that the official record so far points the other way. I get that "No evidence found" is not proof that no aliens exist. But ask yourself what evidence would change your mind. If the answer is that any denial proves the cover-up, the claim can't be tested.

I don't know what you mean by "Wearable realistic holograms exist." If you mean images that only the wearer sees, those exist: mixed-reality headsets like Microsoft HoloLens overlay 3D images onto the real world, but nobody else can see them. If you mean a worn projection that other people see as a real person or object, nothing like that is publicly known. Any accredited engineer will tell you that power demands also make battery-powered holographic displays impractical for now.

[shmosh]

The amount of threads that get derailed by this flat earth bullshit

[BJV]

so dre says two projects.

one is clae
one is unknown

stat quo in recent 3rd Verse said he was at Dre's house and heard new Dre, 10-12 tracks I think he said... not sure number.. but said heard track after track after track and it was one after another .. said Dre's best work EVER

is that the project?

We also had people saying this type of shit after Missionary listening sessions.

[TraceOneInfinite]

Like a lot of interviews that aren't professional journalists, Cube and Mike were cutting Dre off and making him lose his train of thought right when it sounded like he was going to say some good shit. But other than that, pretty good interview. Good chemistry and you can tell it wasn't the scripted type interviews Dr. Dre usually does.

Exactly, I noticed that too... like we finally after all these years get Dre actually sayin something real in an interview and they cut him off.  That's their guest!!  That's dr Dre dammit !! 

But it wasn't extreme, they still did a great job with him overall and best in years

[goodyoung]

But it wasn't extreme, they still did a great job with him overall and best in years

Truue

We also had people saying this type of shit after Missionary listening sessions.

Not Stat tho, he's been pretty vocal with his opinion on current Dre'swork

[Jay_J]

It actually got kind of deep when Dre and Cube were arguing about AI

Yeah dre was kinda pushing buttons of cube while arguing. It got serious for a while. By the way im on cube's side.

[genevan]

I asked Dre's favorite Chat GPT how many songs are unreleased if his released material represents only 20% of what he has recorded (using Discogs as the source for released songs).

The answer: 2400 unreleased songs.

[mtbsm]

Truue Not Stat tho, he's been pretty vocal with his opinion on current Dre'swork

i think so too... and stat specifically said dre said it was ok to talk about what he heard....

maybe a roll out started right there..

missionary i just remember dre saying it was "some of his best work"

anyway, i'd watch 3rd verse new episodes to see how they respond to the stepping away part... chance for stat to follow up on what he said earlier

[Detox Is A Myth!!!]

I asked Dre's favorite Chat GPT how many songs are unreleased if his released material represents only 20% of what he has recorded (using Discogs as the source for released songs).

The answer: 2400 unreleased songs.

2,400 is probably believable considering Dre has been producing since the mid-80s - let's say 40 years (1986-2026) to keep it simple. 2,400/40 years = 60 unreleased songs each year. That's sounds believable. In fact, 365 days / 60 songs = 1 unreleased song every 6 days.

Granted, these are super rough estimates, but if Dre produces one unreleased song a week, that's very believable. I'm surprised based on the math he doesn't have a lot more, like 7,500 unreleased songs.

[BJV]

2,400 is probably believable considering Dre has been producing since the mid-80s - let's say 40 years (1986-2026) to keep it simple. 2,400/40 years = 60 unreleased songs each year. That's sounds believable. In fact, 365 days / 60 songs = 1 unreleased song every 6 days.

Granted, these are super rough estimates, but if Dre produces one unreleased song a week, that's very believable. I'm surprised based on the math he doesn't have a lot more, like 7,500 unreleased songs.

But theyre not finished songs most likely still there must be some good shit in there.

[Jay_J]

2,400 is probably believable considering Dre has been producing since the mid-80s - let's say 40 years (1986-2026) to keep it simple. 2,400/40 years = 60 unreleased songs each year. That's sounds believable. In fact, 365 days / 60 songs = 1 unreleased song every 6 days.

Granted, these are super rough estimates, but if Dre produces one unreleased song a week, that's very believable. I'm surprised based on the math he doesn't have a lot more, like 7,500 unreleased songs.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WFS1oE5yK_U

[TraceOneInfinite]

Ok, I guess it's child-rape-defending dumb fuck hour from this baby-brained piss drinker lol (check the  ICE CUBE LEFT R. KELLY COLLABORATION OFF RAW FOOTAGE ALBUM thread for more on his child molester sympathy: https://www.dubcnn.com/connect/index.php/topic,350908.0.html)

Something tells me he didn't graduate high school.. and if he did, it was probably over some technicality like P.E. lol.



For anyone else who either didn't take or flunked out of all math and physics classes, this one's for you:

"Do you feel yourself spinning?"
You feel changes in motion, not steady motion. That's why you don't feel a plane cruising at 900 km/h but you do feel turbulence. Earth turns once a day, so the inward acceleration at the equator is tiny: v²/R ≈ (465 m/s)² / 6,371,000 m ≈ 0.034 m/s², about 0.3% of gravity. That's far too small to notice. (These are textbook figures; you can all check the arithmetic.)

"NY→LA takes the same time as LA→NY"
That's false. Anyone whose flown both ways knows this. They're never the same time. Coming back to L.A. is always longer. We're talking over an hour differential here. Westbound flights take longer because they fly into the jet stream, a strong west-to-east band of high-altitude wind, while eastbound flights ride it as a tailwind. New York-LA is actually one of the standard examples. Some morons will say "if Earth spun, one direction should be faster because of the spin itself." But the answer is that the atmosphere rotates with Earth, just as the air inside a moving plane moves with the plane. The difference that does exist comes from wind, not from the rotation. Compare the two directions on any airline's timetable.

"Water is flat: glass, pool, lake, ocean"
The amount of curve depends on distance people, and the curve is very gentle. The drop is roughly d²/2R:

25 m pool: about 0.01 mm of curvature from the middle to the edge. Nothing could detect that.
Ocean, eyes 1.7 m above the water: the horizon is about 4.7 km away (√(2Rh)).

So "I only see flat" is exactly what a globe predicts at human scale. Better tests: ships disappear hull-first over the horizon, and you can see farther from a higher point. Both are easy to watch with binoculars at a beach.

"Planets are just lights; the moon has its own light"
Ordinary binoculars or a cheap telescope settle this in a second. Jupiter shows four moons that change position night to night, and Venus shows phases like the Moon's. Both are what you'd expect from objects lit by the Sun, not from fucking lights. The Moon's phases follow its angle to the Sun, and the dark part of a crescent Moon is faintly lit by light reflected off Earth. A self-lit Moon would explain neither.

"Landed in ‘69 and never went back"
There were six Apollo landings between 1969 and 1972, not one. The program ended for budget and political reasons. People have also gone back toward the Moon recently. The Artemis II crew completed a seven-hour lunar flyby on April 6, 2026, the first human return to the Moon since Apollo 17 in 1972, and set a record for the farthest any humans have traveled from Earth. The four-person crew splashed down on April 10.



For anyone who wants to actually argue with these Neanderthals, make sure your goal isn't to convince them because you won't. Idiots like these rely on distrust of the sources, not on missing facts. Instead, make them do the predicting. For example: Ask them to explain things a flat model can't handle without special excuses, like: why does the shadow on the Moon during a lunar eclipse always look round? Why do people in the southern hemisphere see a different set of stars around a different pole? Why does Antarctica have a midnight sun in December?

A flat-earther who thinks they're smart might say: "So you admit your globe is invisible at every scale I can see. That's convenient." The answer is that it isn't invisible. It just needs either distance or precision. Surveyors, long-range artillery crews, and the people who build long bridges and tunnels all correct for curvature routinely, because the d²/2R figure becomes significant over a few kilometres. If you use this point when arguing with a moron like this, be ready to name tests that someone with ordinary equipment can carry out.

Here's a bonus: Any smooth curve looks more and more like a straight line the closer you zoom in. Mathematicians call this being "locally flat." For a sphere you can put a number on it. Over a horizontal distance d, the surface drops away from a flat line by about d²/2R, where R is Earth's radius, about 6,371 km. That's the same formula behind the pool and ocean figures I gave earlier; it's geometry, so you can check it without trusting a source. Because the drop grows with the square of the distance, it shrinks very quickly as you zoom in:

10 m: about 0.008 mm
1 km: about 8 cm
10 km: about 8 m

Oh isn't that convenient to your Cult Science Convid Narratives:   

"No, the water definitely starts to curve it's just that it only happens at the part that you can't see." (except of course when you have a zoom camera and can actually see objects beyond the alleged curve are still on a flat plane)

"Oh, the Earth definitely spins, it's just it's so fast you can't feel it"  (yet on a plane you feel it anytime there's a bump, plus the plane has a top on it and there's no top when we live on the outer surface of your alleged basketball)

Wow it really is convenient how your narrative works in every way that you can't see and in every way that you can't actually experience except on television and Science books.  Is that kind of like the invisible convid that was killing us we just didn't know it was killing us if the scientists didn't tell us it was.. and the vxxx we didn't know was working unless the scientists told us it was working?

Of course they wouldn't want to restrict travel and make people think the world was a finite ball.  There would be no reason to do that after discovering the Americas precipitated 200 years of European wars fighting over newly discovered lands.  There would be no reason to come up with a coordinated agreement to avoid that.  And there definitely wasn't any "global" coordination in the rollout of the Convid propoganda when your scientific "experts" (clergy) Russia, China, America, and all of Europe were suddenly in agreement on everything.

Consider that your same scientists pushing the Globe spinning water ball Earth and Coward-19; are the same scientists pushing that gender is now on a "spectrum" and that there is actually no male and female

[O.E.800]

Oh isn't that convenient to your Cult Science Convid Narratives:   

"No, the water definitely starts to curve it's just that it only happens at the part that you can't see." (except of course when you have a zoom camera and can actually see objects beyond the alleged curve are still on a flat plane)

"Oh, the Earth definitely spins, it's just it's so fast you can't feel it"  (yet on a plane you feel it anytime there's a bump, plus the plane has a top on it and there's no top when we live on the outer surface of your alleged basketball)

Wow it really is convenient how your narrative works in every way that you can't see and in every way that you can't actually experience except on television and Science books.  Is that kind of like the invisible convid that was killing us we just didn't know it was killing us if the scientists didn't tell us it was.. and the vxxx we didn't know was working unless the scientists told us it was working?

Of course they wouldn't want to restrict travel and make people think the world was a finite ball.  There would be no reason to do that after discovering the Americas precipitated 200 years of European wars fighting over newly discovered lands.  There would be no reason to come up with a coordinated agreement to avoid that.  And there definitely wasn't any "global" coordination in the rollout of the Convid propoganda when your scientific "experts" (clergy) Russia, China, America, and all of Europe were suddenly in agreement on everything.

Consider that your same scientists pushing the Globe spinning water ball Earth and Coward-19; are the same scientists pushing that gender is now on a "spectrum" and that there is actually no male and female

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 😂😂😂