It's May 16, 2024, 09:50:49 AM
I agree on the score.. but by The Sources standard, Roscoe would have gotten 4.5 if he was from N.Y.
the source sucks. they hate too much.
The Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating.
Quote from: KVB on June 15, 2003, 01:47:12 AMThe Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating. Agreed. It's a good, solid album, but it's nothing groundbreaking whatsoever. There's not a song on there I don't like, but at the same time there's not a song on there that I couldn't find elsewhere. 3.5 is just right.
Quote from: Lord Funk on June 15, 2003, 02:46:30 AMQuote from: KVB on June 15, 2003, 01:47:12 AMThe Source is on point for this one. 3.5 mics is exactly what the album deserves, nothing more, nothing less. I couldn't justify giving it a higher rating. Agreed. It's a good, solid album, but it's nothing groundbreaking whatsoever. There's not a song on there I don't like, but at the same time there's not a song on there that I couldn't find elsewhere. 3.5 is just right.i think you're missing the point of our argument. everybody and their mamas know that the source would've had a much more generous review had roscoe been from ny. a solid album doesn't receive a 3.5 from the source. like eminem said "3 and half which means you a piece of shit"