Karl Malone In the Lakers

[Juice]

nobody is qualified to start over Malone

[kuniver]

we'll see next year...and than youll remember Sccit was the first one too tell yall, and youll regret not beliving me...



Why wouldnt they pic him up? He was probably a free agent and he didnt want to end his career without a ring, so he decided "where should I go? hmm, I know...The greatest team in NBA history...the Lakers. Now I can finally get a ring and retire in peace"...I mean the Lakers do need a Power Forward, and if they dont, they'll just keep him as a back-up like they did with Mitch Richmond (which I highly doubt since nobody is qualified to start over Malone)...

Utah has the talent to get a ring, they just dont do it, they went all the way in 97' and fell short.. plus, i doubt Karl Malone will go to the damn lakers, shit, take SHAQ from the lakers and no more rings.. LAKERS BEST TEAM IN NBA HISTORY? i think not, if any team its the Boston Celtics or the Chicago Bulls

[Juice]

LAKERS BEST TEAM IN NBA HISTORY? i think not, if any team its the Boston Celtics or the Chicago Bulls

Those things are ridicule. For sure "new" players are better than players of the past. Look at.. i dont know... 100 meters run. Today's runners are better than past runners. But that's normal. It will always be like that. Always better, always more close to perfection. About basketball, a 18 years old of today can be better than a veteran of 30 years ago (Kobe at 23 is 300x better than Michael Jordan at 23).

So how can you compare Celtics of 60-70 to the Lakers of 2002? I mean.. that's not possible. It's not possible to compare Shaq with Russell. Big Shaq today against the Russell of several years ago = no contest. Tecnical KO after 2 mins. Slam after slam.

So you cant really compare 2 teams who played in 2 different era's, IMO. Bulls vs those Lakers? Shaq vs Wennington? Or today's Kobe vs Jordan. You cant do it, man.

CELTICS ruled. BULLS ruled. LAKERS ruled. And now they rules again. Simple as that.

[kuniver]

Those things are ridicule. For sure "new" players are better than players of the past. Look at.. i dont know... 100 meters run. Today's runners are better than past runners. But that's normal. It will always be like that. Always better, always more close to perfection. About basketball, a 18 years old of today can be better than a veteran of 30 years ago (Kobe at 23 is 300x better than Michael Jordan at 23).

So how can you compare Celtics of 60-70 to the Lakers of 2002? I mean.. that's not possible. It's not possible to compare Shaq with Russell. Big Shaq today against the Russell of several years ago = no contest. Tecnical KO after 2 mins. Slam after slam.

So you cant really compare 2 teams who played in 2 different era's, IMO. Bulls vs those Lakers? Shaq vs Wennington? Or today's Kobe vs Jordan. You cant do it, man.

CELTICS ruled. BULLS ruled. LAKERS ruled. And now they rules again. Simple as that.

There was more competition back then, then there was now... just ask Charles Barkely, besides how can you even compare Jordan to Kobe when Kobe took Jordan's game?
01-02 LAL, 25.2 PPG.. KOBE is 23 now
86-87 CHI, 37.1 PPG.. When JORDAN was 23
Lakers werent winning championships without PHIL JACKSON...
'92 Bulls vs '02 Lakers, '92 Bulls by a landslide

[Juice]

There was more competition back then, then there was now... just ask Charles Barkely, besides how can you even compare Jordan to Kobe when Kobe took Jordan's game?
01-02 LAL, 25.2 PPG.. KOBE is 23 now
86-87 CHI, 37.1 PPG.. When JORDAN was 23
Lakers werent winning championships without PHIL JACKSON...
'92 Bulls vs '02 Lakers, '92 Bulls by a landslide

Naw man.. points doesnt mean a thing! Cut O'Neal from Lakers and Kobe was the best scorer of the last 3 seasons with 40 points a game! It's all about having the winning mentality! Jordan didnt have it as a rookie, 23. Kobe got it now, with 3 titles. It's not that Phil Jackson wins the game alone. He helps the team having the right attitude and mentality.

[Juice]

Lakers werent winning championships without PHIL JACKSON...
'92 Bulls vs '02 Lakers, '92 Bulls by a landslide

Kobe was 19 without Phil Jackson. He's the main reason why Lakers won the titles in the last 3 years IMO. Cause 3 years ago it was SHAQ SUPERSTAR + good players. Now that Kobe is a SUPERSTAR too = titles. IMO.

[LAZY]

malone goin 2 the lakers wuz like ewing goin 2 the sonics

[Javier]

Kobe was 19 without Phil Jackson. He's the main reason why Lakers won the titles in the last 3 years IMO. Cause 3 years ago it was SHAQ SUPERSTAR + good players. Now that Kobe is a SUPERSTAR too = titles. IMO.

Give thanx to Phil Jackson for the Lakers' 3 peat, and give thanx to Phil for the 2 bulls' 3peat

[Juice]

malone goin 2 the lakers wuz like ewing goin 2 the sonics

Naw, totally wrong. LAKERS doesnt really need a PF. I mean.. SHAQ is the man! So.. even Samaki Walker is ok for us! And if Samaki is ok, what about Malone?

Ewing was a dead man walking when he signed with Seattle. And he was the only decent in the middle. So.... problems!

[Juice]

Give thanx to Phil Jackson for the Lakers' 3 peat, and give thanx to Phil for the 2 bulls' 3peat

For sure, for sure!

[kuniver]

How can you say Jordan doesnt have a winning mentality, when he says "If you dont play to compete, then dont play at all"... and trust me on this one, KOBE wouldnt have NO rings if SHAQ wasnt around.. and yes points is everything, scoring wins games along with defense.. ALSO WERE "KOBE SUPERSTAR" + SHAQ SUPERSTAR winning titles when Del Harris was coach? i think not.. so without Phil Jackson, they are also nothing..

[Juice]

How can you say Jordan doesnt have a winning mentality, when he says "If you dont play to compete, then dont play at all"...

I was talking about Jordan at 23. And the same MJ admitted he cared only about dunks and stats than about the team and about winning the games. At 23!

and trust me on this one, KOBE wouldnt have NO rings if SHAQ wasnt around..

Obviously. But it's the same with Jordan and Pippen and the rest of the Bulls. Nobody can win alone.

and yes points is everything, scoring wins games along with defense..

LOL. So Iverson is the MVP of this season?

ALSO WERE "KOBE SUPERSTAR" + SHAQ SUPERSTAR winning titles when Del Harris was coach? i think not.. so without Phil Jackson, they are also nothing..

In fact i said Jackson trasformed the 19 years old Kobe to a superstar. And 2 superstars = title. No, titles! Sorry.

[Javier]

How can you say Jordan doesnt have a winning mentality, when he says "If you dont play to compete, then dont play at all"... and trust me on this one, KOBE wouldnt have NO rings if SHAQ wasnt around.. and yes points is everything, scoring wins games along with defense.. ALSO WERE "KOBE SUPERSTAR" + SHAQ SUPERSTAR winning titles when Del Harris was coach? i think not.. so without Phil Jackson, they are also nothing..

when did Jordan get his rings? OH yea when Pippen and Jackson got in to town.  They were alot of help.  Its all Phil's way of coachin big superstars, and gathering them together.  If Phil would have went to the Knicks, i wouldnt be surprise that Knicks would have at least 2 rings, and the lakers would have kept on chokin.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

What did I tell you fuckers way before anyone had a clue?

[JTSimon]

What did I tell you fuckers way before anyone had a clue?

Get your ass out of here