Author Topic: The Chronic VS. Doggystyle (Read 662 times)

Don Jacob · « **Reply #30 on:** October 12, 2003, 05:21:33 PM »

yeah that's why these albums are classics......most hip hop albums have SHITTY production.....these albums along with efil4zaggin created real productin in hip hop.....they're still the refference of what good production is.

Lincoln · « **Reply #31 on:** October 12, 2003, 08:10:40 PM »

Quote from: Don Jacob Corleone on October 12, 2003, 05:21:33 PM

yeah that's why these albums are classics......most hip hop albums have SHITTY production.....these albums along with efil4zaggin created real productin in hip hop.....they're still the refference of what good production is.

You missed the point. They both have great production, I can agree with that. But the lyrics aren't as good as the production which is why I don't think they are perfect.

R-Tistic · « **Reply #32 on:** October 12, 2003, 11:45:16 PM »

Quote from: Lincoln on October 12, 2003, 02:48:21 PM

Quote from: Don Jacob Corleone on October 11, 2003, 09:58:15 PM
lyrically maybe

but production wise you kids are out of your gord to say there is a ton of albums better.

Lyrics are just as important as beats.

Not to everybody. To me, overall I'd say Beats 65%, Lyrics Voice Style Flow 35%. Maybe it's because I'm a producer, or because I grew up listenin to Jazz and old school music that focused on music over lyrics. Like Parliament, the lyrics were amuzingly simple and stupid but who cared, the music made it dope.

Thas y i think doggystyle is the best album ever, because of production first, but because his flow and voice went perfect with every song, and even tho his lyrics weren't on this new era complex multi shit, they were better than average.