It's May 13, 2024, 01:30:54 AM
Quote from: Don Rizzle on November 28, 2003, 03:46:53 PMon asylum i think we should adopt an approach like holland where the true seekers will be help in the necessary ways and the economic migrants get sent home. holland got it to a tee. if we had it like they do asylum wouldn't be an issueWhy should we accept any asylum seekers? Like Overseer said, you're meant to claim asylum in the first safe country. This means that we should only be getting Asylum seekers from surrounding countries such as Ireland, France and Holland (currently safe).
on asylum i think we should adopt an approach like holland where the true seekers will be help in the necessary ways and the economic migrants get sent home. holland got it to a tee. if we had it like they do asylum wouldn't be an issue
The majority of Asylum Seekers have come from countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, all of which Britain has had a influence in bombing or invading, most people go to the nearest country, there were are over a million refugees in pakistan from Afghanistan. People come to Britain because for some reason they see britain as a great country where they want to make a new life, alot speak English, listen to BBC world service or have family in Britain. I'll happily exchange asylum seekers for any BNP scum like you.According to a recent Home Office study, migrants, including asylum seekers and refugees contribute 10 per cent more to the economy in taxes and national insurance than they consume in benefits and public services - making a net fiscal contribution of approximately 2.5 billion (1999-2000), worth 1p on income tax. For every one percent immigration into the UK there is a two percent increase in the wages of the non-migrant workforce. The UK gives asylum seekers less financial support than other European countries. An adult asylum seeker receives £37.77 a week. Asylum seekers are not allowed to work for their first 6 months of residence.In 2001, the UK received less than 0.01 per cent of the global refugee population why dont you fuck off to a nazi or white power message board.
Anyway there are more important issues like the unbelieveably high rate of teenage pregnancy, the rise of gun crime, the amount of little girls turning up dead in ditches and the rise in hate crime in Britain. What is the BNP's stance on these issues?
Why the hell should they let their country begin to resemble a third world country?
There is nothing racist about wanting to preserve your country and your culture. Otherwise, that makes every group of people in the world racist. Unfortunately, opponents of the BNP dubb them racist because they can't come up with an intelligent argument to dispute what they are saying.
Neo-Nazi racists?Hardly. Its a common misunderstanding that BNP are a racist organisation, mostly because of the bias of BBC and other TV channels. Racists hate people of a different ethnic background. The BNP certainly don't hate such people. They believe that the heritage of Britain should be kept intact. The ethnicity and cultural background of the British is been destroyed.They also support capital punishment, are against homosexual propoganda, and would put OAPs ahead of asylum seekers.