Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Saddam captured?
dexter:
Well said King Tech!!!!!
King Tech Quadafi:
--- Quote from: Trauma on December 16, 2003, 05:48:11 PM ---Awwwww. Mommy forgot to pay Tech's cell phone bill again.
YOU ... YOU... YOU MAKE ME SO MAD I'm GONNA YELL AT MY COMPUTER!!!!!!!!
you probably sprained a pinky trying to type that shit out.
--- End quote ---
And youre still a fuckin moron who tows the party line like a dumb brain dead, comotose zombie.
Hey Trauma, wheres the WMD that Rumsfeld said could be identified within 45 minutes?
Hey Trauma, dont u find it odd that after 8 months of being in Iraq they have found nothing?
Hey Trauma, dont you find it wierd that the justification for this war has switched at least three times?
Hey Trauma, isnt it a coincidence that the right wing neo cons have had the most to gain from this war?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that there is no conclusive proof that points to the existence of WMD or Baath connections with international terrorists, how exactly was Iraq a threat to the United States?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that you enjoy tremendously the liberation of Muslims from oppression, and the right to self determination, whether you support the intervention of American troops in the following countries:
Algeria
Egypt
Jordan
Israel/ Occupied Territories
Pakistan
Chechnya
Turkey
LOL @ You still reaching......didnt I put you in your place years ago?
Trauma-san:
So lemme get this straight.
Saddam is evil, and was evil. check.
In the late 80's, the U.S. didn't do anything about it. check.
In the early 90's, the U.S. did do somethign about it, but didn't finish the job. check.
In the mid 90's, the U.S. ignored the problem. check.
In the early 2000's, the U.S. invaded Iraq and destroyed the entire government there, eventually ousting the president and holding him prisoner. check.
Now, where in this equation does it become illegal to hate Saddam? where in this equation, does it make it alright for YOU to not like Saddam, but I have no option to dislike Saddam? Where in this equation, do I start giving A RATS ASS about your relationship to Saddam Hussein? I could give a FUCK what Saddam did to your family. I don't like the motherfucker, and from the first time I heard about him, as a fucking child, in 91, I didn't like him. Why is it, that I am being clowned for hating a man who has always been evil, and who I've hated since the day I was aware of his existance?
Grow the fuck up, Tech. You think you're the only one who can make moral judgements. You think that you're the only one who's informed on anything, and that the entire United States are a bunch of hillbillies being told what to believe by the government. I've got a newsflash for you. I'm a good judge of character. If someone was telling me bullshit, I'd see it as bullshit. That's why I see through YOUR bullshit. I don't need people to tell me that you're a fuckup, I can just TELL. Likewise, I can tell that I don't like Saddam Hussein.
Now, I'm sorry that I just don't ignore that he was captured, I'm sorry that I didn't ask you for permission to rejoice at his attainment, but I have my own life to live, and I'll make my own decisions about who to hate, and who not to hate. For you to think that I make my decisions based on the media is amazing. I don't even watch fucking t.v. I search out my own information, like MUCH of America does. The reason America is what it is, where it is, is because assclowns like you underestimate us. So keep on believing that all Americans are idiots, and that we can't tie our own shoelaces, and we'll keep on making all the hard decisions for ants like you who got chased the fuck out of your country. If it wasn't for us, Saddam would be chasing MORE families out of countries, just like you, and you hate that we've helped you. Boo fucking hoo.
King Tech Quadafi:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:57:20 PM ---[
Hey Trauma, wheres the WMD that Rumsfeld said could be identified within 45 minutes?
Hey Trauma, dont u find it odd that after 8 months of being in Iraq they have found nothing?
Hey Trauma, dont you find it wierd that the justification for this war has switched at least three times?
Hey Trauma, isnt it a coincidence that the right wing neo cons have had the most to gain from this war?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that there is no conclusive proof that points to the existence of WMD or Baath connections with international terrorists, how exactly was Iraq a threat to the United States?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that you enjoy tremendously the liberation of Muslims from oppression, and the right to self determination, whether you support the intervention of American troops in the following countries:
Algeria
Egypt
Jordan
Israel/ Occupied Territories
Pakistan
Chechnya
Turkey
--- End quote ---
Trauma-san:
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 06:04:39 PM ---
--- Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on December 16, 2003, 05:57:20 PM ---[
Hey Trauma, wheres the WMD that Rumsfeld said could be identified within 45 minutes?
Hey Trauma, dont u find it odd that after 8 months of being in Iraq they have found nothing?
Hey Trauma, dont you find it wierd that the justification for this war has switched at least three times?
Hey Trauma, isnt it a coincidence that the right wing neo cons have had the most to gain from this war?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that there is no conclusive proof that points to the existence of WMD or Baath connections with international terrorists, how exactly was Iraq a threat to the United States?
Hey Trauma, seeing as that you enjoy tremendously the liberation of Muslims from oppression, and the right to self determination, whether you support the intervention of American troops in the following countries:
Algeria
Egypt
Jordan
Israel/ Occupied Territories
Pakistan
Chechnya
Turkey
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
First, Rumsfeld never said that there were WMD that could be identified in 45 minutes. UNFORTUNATELY, the media led you to believe he said that. IF YOU WOULD HAVE WATCHED the actual comments, than maybe you could make an intelligent comment here. I imagine you copied and pasted that from some fucking anti-capitalism board you visit or something, or maybe the Afgan to English translation fucked up, but what Rumsfeld said, was that Iraq had weapons that could be DEPLOYED in 45 minutes or less. Do you understand the difference there?
Here, I'll walk you through it. See, IDENTIFIED means that they could be found, and labeled as wmd in 45 minutes. That would be quite impossible, wouldn't it? I mean, I know we have a kick-ass army, but I don't think even Hillary would want the army to find the WMD in 45 minutes. DEPLOYED, on the other hand, means that the WMD could be set up, and USED in less than 45 minutes. You know, kind of like your little arab buddies running around in the desert shooting grenades at Jumbo Jets. Fast shit like that.
Now, even though your ENTIRE FUCKING PREMISE is without merit, becuase Rumsfeld never said that, i'll imagine that you meant where are the WMD that Rumsfeld said EXISTED. We'll just say they EXISTED.
First off, did they exist? Certainly. Any intelligent person can come to that assumption, can't he? Saddam, everybody knows, famously gassed his own people in the early 90's, and those biological weapons are known as weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION. Therefore, yes, the weapons did exist. Also of note, is the fact that Bill Clinton, the former president of the United States, was also of the opinion, in office, and after the war started, that Iraq had "Biological, Chemical, and Nuclear" weapons of Mass Destruction. NUCLEAR. This is from the mouth of President Bush's biggest distractor. Why does he think this? Because he was the head of CIA, the FBI, and had access to the collective intelligence of not only the United States, but other countries such as England's intelligence that led to the fact that Saddam Hussein did in fact have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Clinton even bombed Iraq over this in the late 90's. Since you've just recently started being a zealot, you probably weren't paying attention then.
Not only did Bill Clinton and George Bush feel that Iraq had weapons of Mass Destruction, but the United Nations also felt that he did. They even situated inspectors in his country for 10 years searching for them. Saddam produced documents detailing weapons of mass destruction that he ADMITTED TO HAVING (chemical weapons) to the U.N., and the U.N. even passed 17 resolutions saying that Iraq had wmd, in violation of their peace treaty with the U.S. 17 times the U.N. said they had WMD.
So, we've SEEN saddam use WMD, and the United States and the United Nations for 12 years has thought that Saddam had WMD.
On the other hand; we have Tech. Tech says Saddam doesn't. Tech, who was chased out of Kuwait as a kid by Saddam PERSONALLY on a white horse, KNOWS THE TRUTH. Tech knows, yes, that's right, different than the sum of the intelligence of the United Nations.
Tech. Come off your high horse, buddy. YOU DO NOT KNOW more about this situation than the United Nations does! You just don't, I don't care how many times Saddam raped your mommy (By the way, don't you claim you lived in every country that the United States has a spat with?).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version