Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Saddam captured?
Paradox:
--- Quote from: Trauma on December 16, 2003, 05:28:41 PM ---
--- Quote from: Paradox on December 16, 2003, 05:04:42 PM ---
--- Quote from: Trauma on December 16, 2003, 05:02:45 PM ---
--- Quote from: .:ImC:. on December 16, 2003, 04:59:27 PM ---ROFL! Oil! Oil? Germany, France and Russia take Oil there! And they are the 3 biggest creditors of Saddam Hussein in the WORLD.
--- End quote ---
I know man, and everybody keeps ignoring this. Also, the United Nations was making a percentage off of every barrel of oil sold under Iraq's "food for oil" program, and, surprise surprise! the U.N. and Anon weren't behind the war! They even made 17 proclamations threatening action against Iraq, and then never acted on any of them! Why would that be? Maybe they didn't want to give up the 2 billion dollars a year they were making off Iraq's oil sales. "Oil for Food" was the most corrupt money making scheme the U.N. has ever been involved in. Saddam wasn't even spending the money on food! He was buying fucking helicopters and shit, and building wanna-be disneylands in the desert while his people starved to death.
--- End quote ---
Yes, Saddam was horrible. And who put him in power? And why didn't we do anything about him when the oil fields weren't nationalized?
--- End quote ---
Ask Bill Clinton.
--- End quote ---
LOL. If you think Saddam's terror began in the 90s you're a fool. Saddam's been doing his shit for decades, but the U.S. didn't give a fuck. We gave him weapons. Since he hooked it up with oil, he was our buddy, but as soon as he nationalized the oil fields, he became a "cruel dictator" (which he always). Once again you prove to us your ignorance.
Don Jacob:
^ he didn't say his reign of terror started in the 90's helmet retard
tech you're off your rocker. trauma made an interesting comment about your intellegence that i think holds true. you drop all of this 'knowledge' about foriegn affairs to relative novices on this part of the board...i'll credit you that. but you go on and make RETARDED posts concerning musical, personal, and social matters. my point being here is, if you can't seperate good and bad in relatively simple subjects.......how credible are you when it comes to complex matters?
and no i don't believe this war is for oil.......to go back to page 4's lil argument. when this war first broke out i thought it was......hey i drive a monster GT mustang that chugs gas like beer at a kegger AND live in california home of high gas prices, i was anticipating a price break. but FUCK gas is still damn near 2 bucks a gallon STILL! STIIIIIIIIIIIILL. if the US's mission was the oil we certainly failed terribley
THE ONLY THING THE US ACCOMPLISHED WITH THIS WAR IS:
-overturning an evil government
-getting rid of an evil leader and his evil sons
-stimulating the economy
-defense stocks and jobs rose
every time i hear these little cynical pricks say
"the us is only in iraq for oil" i laugh my ass off
the worst thing i can think of that the us is doing over there is US companies are making a profit off of rebuilding the country.
morally it feels wrong cuz it's exploitation. but i can't say i blame us , the whole world basically turned their backs on us.....but i think the contracts should be divided equally with the willing countries.
that's one of the only things i can say i don't like about this war.
Don Jacob:
oh and about putting saddam on trial.
i think the people of iraq should convict him.....i think that's MORE than fair. if a world wide court was set up i think it'd take forever like melosivic's (spelling?) trial....which correct me if i'm wrong....is still going on. (?)
anyways back to the people convicting saddam. if they choose to hang him from his nuts in Baghdad square, than so be it. if they have him take an acid bath....so be it. I think that'd be better to have than have him sit in some soft ass wanna be so called prison in norway.
Trauma-san:
Don, Please know... no matter WHAT the U.S. does in the world, and no matter WHAT we decide to do with Saddam, it won't be enough for anybody. We'll get slammed, and shit on, by half the world, and probably every single muslim country in the world, because they see absolutely no good in us, to them, we're just a big evil empire fucking everybody over. So again, it doesn't even matter what we do with Saddam, nobody will appreciate it anyways.
Immortal:
--- Quote from: Paradox on December 16, 2003, 04:51:05 PM ---It's all about the oil. Always has been, always will be. We don't give a fuck about the Iraqi people, we don't give a fuck about any of the Arabs. If we did, we would be in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc. We like Egypt's dictator because he does what we tell him. We don't care how cruel he is to his people, as long as he's our little bitch. In fact, Egypt and Morocco are so horrible that Arabs are threatened to be sent there for prison terms if they don't cooperate with the U.S. intelligence personnel. Do we give a fuck? Of course not. Did we give a fuck when Saddam was killing his people? No. We said "here's some new weapons, try them, and see how they work out for you". If we cared about the Iraqi people, no sanctions would have been placed upon them. The sanctions killed many Iraqis (civilian deaths are also going against the Geneva Convention, which we don't seem to give a fuck about). Everytime a dictator or cruel leader turns against the U.S. then we recognize him as being one. That's always been the case. Central America, the Middle East... self-interest. The people are worthless to us.
--- End quote ---
u got a point....its the americans fukin fault for suppling iraq those fukin weapons...damn capitalistic society...but i know its wrong what america did, however im still kinda with them cause im a greedy ass fuck thats been born into this capitalistic hellhole
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version