It's May 13, 2024, 01:42:55 AM
So let me get this straight. I totally fuck up your entire argument, by breaking it down to quotes and your own hypocricy, and you abandon that thread and move on. It's actually a good idea, but you can't expect me to read this shit before I reply this post to it
well they did find those trucks that could be/were once used for chemical weapons so there goes your place...you don't have to manufacture them if you have enough money....so....
Quote from: smerlus on February 11, 2004, 08:42:29 PMwell they did find those trucks that could be/were once used for chemical weapons so there goes your place...you don't have to manufacture them if you have enough money....so....Oh yea, those trucks we saw on TV. I mean if a truck is on a road in Iraq, it must contain weapons. There is absolutely no way that anything else could be in there.And even with your STUPID comment, you show that you still have doubts. "well they did find those trucks that COULD BE..." Yes, and the U.S. COULD BE in Iraq just for the oil. If you have doubts on one side, then logically there is also doubt on the contrary, which correlates to you not having a fuckin clue about anything and just yapping your mouth for no reason.
Quote from: Soul_On_Ice on February 11, 2004, 11:58:13 PMQuote from: smerlus on February 11, 2004, 08:42:29 PMwell they did find those trucks that could be/were once used for chemical weapons so there goes your place...you don't have to manufacture them if you have enough money....so....Oh yea, those trucks we saw on TV. I mean if a truck is on a road in Iraq, it must contain weapons. There is absolutely no way that anything else could be in there.And even with your STUPID comment, you show that you still have doubts. "well they did find those trucks that COULD BE..." Yes, and the U.S. COULD BE in Iraq just for the oil. If you have doubts on one side, then logically there is also doubt on the contrary, which correlates to you not having a fuckin clue about anything and just yapping your mouth for no reason. well actually if you want to nit pick everything i say like the little bitch you are....they did say those trucks contained chemical weapons at one point so you can go fuck yourself
Quote from: smerlus on February 12, 2004, 12:00:18 AMQuote from: Soul_On_Ice on February 11, 2004, 11:58:13 PMQuote from: smerlus on February 11, 2004, 08:42:29 PMwell they did find those trucks that could be/were once used for chemical weapons so there goes your place...you don't have to manufacture them if you have enough money....so....Oh yea, those trucks we saw on TV. I mean if a truck is on a road in Iraq, it must contain weapons. There is absolutely no way that anything else could be in there.And even with your STUPID comment, you show that you still have doubts. "well they did find those trucks that COULD BE..." Yes, and the U.S. COULD BE in Iraq just for the oil. If you have doubts on one side, then logically there is also doubt on the contrary, which correlates to you not having a fuckin clue about anything and just yapping your mouth for no reason. well actually if you want to nit pick everything i say like the little bitch you are....they did say those trucks contained chemical weapons at one point so you can go fuck yourselfHOLY SHIT! THEY SAID IT? DAMN, IT MUST BE TRUE THEN. Thanks for clearing that up for me man. You were completely right. If they said the trucks contained chemical weapons, then OF COURSE they did. How could I be so dumb for not believing what they say.
Wow, you're a bigger idiot than I thought, and that's saying a lot. How can you compare invading a nation with no credible reason to finding a cure for AIDS? Are you that much of a moron? Let me break it down for you.We invaded Iraq on the reason that there are WMDs. Now we find out there never were any, and if there are we never found them, hence there not being any proof for our reason to invade. The administration told us they know exactly where they are. My point is that we had no PROOF. When it comes down to the law, someone being tried in court, the judge can't send the person to jail, unless there is PROOF he's guilty. He can't just assume it. That's what we did. Now you're comparing that to us finding a cure for AIDS. There might be one, there might not. So, we should spend our money and try to find one. Nothing wrong with that. But that's completely different from attacking a nation, killing its citizens, spending $85 billion of our tax dollars, and not having any proof. If you can't see the difference, then again, I feel sorry for you.