It's May 11, 2024, 08:01:50 AM
^^Oh look...Terrorist homes destroyed.
You fucking pieces of shit who compare soldiers to terrorists deserve to die...TERRORISTS AIM FOR CIVILIANS. ISRAELI SOLDIERS AIM FOR TERRORISTS, AND IF THEY HIT CIVILIANS, IT IS UNINTENTIONAL. AND WHEN ISRAELI SOLDIERS INTENTIONALLY KILLS A PALESTINIAN CIVILIAN, IT IS NOT BACKED BY OUR GOVERNMENT...fucking morons.
Want me to post up a bunch of nasty ass pics of dead Isreali children from blown up busses and falafel stands?
you're morally bankrupt...
Quote from: Now_I_Know on April 18, 2004, 02:57:33 AM^^Oh look...Terrorist homes destroyed.Let's take a look at some of the "terrorists" that died in those "terrorist homes" (since all the buildings that were randomly bombed were homes to terrorists and the Israeli army just kills terrorists)And this apartment building was named "Terrorist Gardens" since only terrorists lived in the whole building"Terrorist Suites""Hey there, look at my window. The Israeli army made it for us because my whole family is made up of nothing but a buncha terrorists"Terrorist Law Office"Dude, what happened to my city?""STOP FILMING US. WE'RE KILLING PEOPLE HERE, CAN YOU MOVE OUT OF THE WAY, AND STOP EXPOSING US, OR I WILL SHOOT YOU. I'M AN ISRAELI SOLDIER, SO I CAN KILL YOU, AND IT WON'T MATTER BECAUSE I WEAR A UNIFORM."HERE'S A LADY WHO ENTERED JENIN AND SAW THE BODIES OF THE INNOCENT PEOPLE WHO DIED. COME ON, TELL HER THAT THEY WERE ALL A BUNCHA TERRORISTS AND SHE'S JUST A CRYBABY.
Israel's moral inferiority exemplified (for dummies)Baha AbushaqraSeptember 27, 2002A recent statistical assessment carried by the AP [1] determined that close to half of the victims of Israel's so-called "targeted killings," perpetrated by state of the art military, are bystanders. Referring to the so-called "targeted killings," the AP story put it as follows: "In two years of fighting, such attacks have killed 78 militants and 52 civilians." Who is a "militant" according to Israel? Who is a "terrorist" according to Israel? Apparently, they both deserve the same fate -- extra-judicial liquidation! 52 Palestinian civilians out of a total of 130 killed is 40%, notwithstanding the injured. Not very "targeted," wouldn't you agree? But, let's put things into perspective. IDF sources put the Israeli civilian causality rate, due to Palestinian attacks, at 436 out of 622 total deaths (Sept 29, 2000 - Sept 26, 2002) [2]. This means that the Israeli civilian causality rate is at 70%. There is a catch though: Israel considers armed settlers as civilians [various UN resolutions have reaffirmed the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for liberation from colonial domination and alien subjection, "by all available means including armed struggle" [3]]. Though it is hard to obtain specific data, anyone who has been following the intifada would agree that it would be reasonable to say that 50% of these so-called Israeli civilians were actually settlers. So, that puts the Israeli civilian causality rate closer to 35%. In other words, comparable to that of Israel's "targeted attacks." Settlers qualify as militants par excellence, not only because they live on confiscated land in apartheid ivory towers but also because they have been actively involved in the killing of Palestinian civilians. "Targeted killings" have killed 78 Palestinian "militants," the AP story said, and you get the impression it was ok! What about the worthiness of Israeli militants? What's good for the goose...? But wait! Out of 1,897 total Palestinian deaths (Sept 29, 2000 - Sept 22, 2002) (40,000 plus injured), about 85% are non-combatants (22% under 18) [4]. That's a civilian causality rate of 3:1 (three times more Palestinian civilians killed than Israeli civilians killed). This is material for great embarrassment for Israel, for it proves that the Israeli forces are as every bit as sadistic as the suicide bombers, notwithstanding the age-old military occupation. Israel is the occupier, the overlord, yet it still claims moral superiority. How does that work? They kill, injure and maim a multitude more of civilians, notwithstanding the havoc, confiscate land, bulldoze homes, uproot orchids, shoot unarmed demonstrators, etc and still claim moral superiority?
Sharon’s U-turn on talks with PalestiniansUSA must pressure Israel: Arab ministers Jerusalem, March 9Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has said that truce talks with the Palestinians would have to take place “under fire”, apparently backing down on his demand for a prior seven-day period of calm.“I thought we could reach a period of respite before a ceasefire,” Sharon yesterday told Israel’s second television channel. “But this is a war situation we are experiencing.”“The negotiations for a ceasefire will take place under fire,” the Premier was quoted as saying by the television, which stressed Sharon was going back on his condition for a week of total calm.However, an adviser to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat dismissed the surprise declaration from Sharon as having “no value” and said the Israelis would have to stop their raids into Palestinian lands.“Sharon must realize that he cannot obtain an end to the violence with a military solution. His declaration on negotiations of a truce “under fire” have no value; he must stop his massacres and aggression against the Palestinian people,” Nabil Abou Roudeina, told newsmen in Gaza city.Sharon had not budged since his election as Israel’s Prime Minister more than a year ago in his insistence on a period of seven days of calm before negotiating with the Palestinians.His apparent turnaround comes ahead of a new visit to the region next week by US peace envoy Anthony Zinni and at the end of the deadliest day of Israeli-Palestinian violence since 1987.Sharon has come under intense U.S. pressure to implement the deal “as quickly as possible” amid the most ferocious fighting since a Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation broke out in September 2000 after peace talks froze.Palestinian officials said his shift amounted to an admission Israel’s security policies had failed.Israeli forces inflicted the bloodiest losses on Palestinians on any single day of the fighting, killing 38 in raids yesterday after an attack on a Jewish settlement in Gaza in which five students were killed.Total Palestinian deaths in the uprising exceeded 1,000 as Israel launched air, land and sea assaults on the West Bank and Gaza as part of Sharon’s declared aim to hit Palestinians hard until they sue for peace.The number of Israeli fatalities stood at nearly 320, according to a tally compiled by Reuters.Palestinian officials have accused the Israeli army of carrying out “massacres” but the Israeli government says it is striking at “terror networks” that have targeted Israelis with suicide bombings and shooting attacks.
Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 10, 2006, 03:16:12 AMiraq would just get annexed by iranThat would be a great solution. If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
iraq would just get annexed by iran