It's June 10, 2024, 07:03:14 AM
Well Tom, lets analyze that one for a sec. Since Elvis is fucking dead; I'd guess he means we'd be taking the artists from their prime, not their current state. So yea, 84 Jackson Vs. 68 Elvis.
Quote from: SMiLE on May 27, 2004, 09:15:24 PMWell Tom, lets analyze that one for a sec. Since Elvis is fucking dead; I'd guess he means we'd be taking the artists from their prime, not their current state. So yea, 84 Jackson Vs. 68 Elvis. First off Agree 100% that Elvis would win the competition. But I' d think the '56-'58 Elvis would do a lot better than the '68 one, most of his dance moves were fading away by then.
Quote from: Shallow on May 27, 2004, 10:28:40 PMQuote from: SMiLE on May 27, 2004, 09:15:24 PMWell Tom, lets analyze that one for a sec. Since Elvis is fucking dead; I'd guess he means we'd be taking the artists from their prime, not their current state. So yea, 84 Jackson Vs. 68 Elvis. First off Agree 100% that Elvis would win the competition. But I' d think the '56-'58 Elvis would do a lot better than the '68 one, most of his dance moves were fading away by then.That's arguable. Elvis hadn't forgotten any dance moves by '68, that was the year of his Comeback Special, I would consider that the highlight of his career. Here's '56 Elvisand here's '68 ElvisShiiiiiit. '68 Elvis would have been huge (Fuck, he WAS huge, and I don't mean physically yet).
dude im baning you mother over here in eu. but im not a white,brown,black,yellow etc. im your nightmare