Bush vs. Clinton

[white Boy]

Who is the better president, bush or clinton?  also, hypotheticaly, if u could vote for clinton for president  now, would you?

[Montana00]

Yea...clinton.

[pappy]

AL ROKER

[Trauma-san]

Bush.  

[JTSimon]

Clinton  

         
9/11 timeline
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&theme=saudi&startpos=50

[M Dogg™]

Clinton, when he did some military shit like bomb an Al Queda base, we never knew about it. He never let the other people know what he was going to do, which is Bush's biggest mistake.

[M Dogg™]

Oh, lets not forget welfare reform, something he ran on, to get people off welfare, and higher benefits to the elderly. The only thing he couldn't pull off was universal health care, which would be great if he ever did.

[Montana00]

what are you tlaking about?

bush lets us know what hes doing.

Were fighting terrorism in iraq, and taking away the immanent threat of nuclear weapons.  

[Smoke]

Didnt Clinton support Bush bombing Al Quaeda and Iraq?

[M Dogg™]

Didnt Clinton support Bush bombing Al Quaeda and Iraq?

yep yep... as I said, Clinton did the same thing. Only difference is that one did his work without anyone knowing, the other did his well puffing up smoke, and yelling at the whole world he was going to do it. It's like the mafia, you need to strike in silence. Clinton kept it gangsta, Bush is a cowboy.

[Smoke]

Anyway i've noticed the left wing here in Europe never liked Bush no matter what. Just see the left wing here in Italy: they hated Bush since day one. Remember the pics of Error showing some idiots parading against Bush? It was the extreme left wing of Italy. They never attacked Clinton (who did the same things, like you said). They attacks Bush everyday. I think the main "fault" of Bush is that the left wings of Europe dont like him (because of his party). I might be wrong but it's clear to me. He's wrong no matter what he does.

[M Dogg™]

It's the way both went about it. Clinton would have never started a war with Iraq, but he did bomb suspected places that the CIA thought Iraq was hidding weapons. With Al Quada, we bomb their terrorist training camps, but never thought about taking out the Taliban. Clinton also did most of this in the downlow. We would watch the news, and out of no where you'd hear "military bombed a suspected terrorist camp of the group Al Quada... now on to sports..." And I'm being for reals. No one knew a thing, not even Americans. Now with Bush it's like, Saddam has weapons, and we are going to take over Iraq and get them. Clinton wouldn't have done that, he would have sent people to check the place out, then attacked, Bush did it very wrecklessly. Also, Clinton was more focused on Middle Eastern peace, which is why he kept a lot of stuff low key. At the same time Clinton was trying to be a go between of the other countries, and Clinton was a good public speaker, so people liked him. Bush is more of a hard nose president that takes no shit. Either it's his way, or no way at all. Clinton was a president that communicated more. Clinton's faults come in that he can't keep his paints up. Bush's faults come in that he can't keep his mouth closed. Bush would be the mafia boss every knows of and gets caught, Clinton would be the mafia boss that stays in the side and keeps the peace between families. Basically we have Vito verses Vincent, what we need really is Michael.

[Smoke]

And do you have a 'Michael' to vote in the next elections?

[Don Rizzle]

i always respected and liked clinton even thru his scandal which is something which can never be said for bush. in about 1 year he managed to turn the whole world from loving and supporting america to a much more hostile international enviroment. he started wars with two governments which america set up (uhum lessons to be learned maybe?) which has made america alot less safe than before he started out

[Smoke]

which has made america alot less safe than before he started out

Remember Bin Laden bombed NY BEFORE Bush made them 2 wars.