Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

Bonds VS Griffey

<< < (2/3) > >>

pappy:
thats not the question


im asking who would you rather have.  a healthy griffey in his prime or the current bonds juiced up on steroids

M Dogg™:
First off, Bonds is not on 'roids. 2nd, I said it back in 1995, 1998, and I'll say it again in 2004, I'll take Bonds over Griffey anytime of the week. Bonds in his prime was the best all around player in the game, only Griffey came close, but Bonds was still better. At the time, Griffey hit for more home runs, but as Bonds became an older, and slower player, he focused on his power game, not that he didn't have one already. But his perfection of his swing, and his larger frame helped him in his power game. To prove he wasn't juiced, he exposed his old man's gut. Bonds has a swing that pulls ahead of a 98 mph fastball, and he changes the whole game when his up to bat, not because of his bulk but because of his swing.

Don Jacob:
Griffey

that swing was/is perfection

also griffey was/is a better fielder


take away all those injuries that woulve ENDED any other players careers, you got the potential GOAT

GoodLuvn169:
Bonds Bitch  ;D

.:DayGoStyLz:.:
Griffey, easily!!!! All around a much better player then Bonds. Faster, Better baserunner, better in the field, better hitter (like Tom said, without tha roids). The injuries really fucked him up. Imagine what kind of homerun races we would have had over the last few years, if a healthy Griffey was involved!! damn...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page