Author Topic: King Arthur  (Read 658 times)

Sikotic™

King Arthur
« on: July 09, 2004, 10:11:30 PM »
Wasn't a bad movie, but it wasn't anything special either. I definitely prefer it more than the sissy fairytale shit.
 

Throwback

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2004, 02:23:56 AM »
it was a bit promoted here as a sort of braveheart movie, is it anythin like that?
 

Montana00

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2004, 08:28:15 AM »
im not going to go see it, it looks extremely lame.
 

Eddie G.

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9707
  • Karma: 884
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2004, 02:10:27 PM »
Ehh it looks pretty boring, I might check it out if there's nothing else to do
 

Sikotic™

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2004, 02:17:34 PM »
it was a bit promoted here as a sort of braveheart movie, is it anythin like that?

Yeah, it was just a really shitty Braveheart. To be honest, I went to see it cuz of Keira Knightly lol. Don't do it though, because she's not even really in the movie that much. Fuckin false advertisement.
 

Suga Foot

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2004, 07:06:54 PM »
Jon Stewart says it's a "big sack of shit" lol
 

...'BfCfC'...

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
  • Karma: 84
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2004, 01:41:38 PM »
i thought it was a good film  :-\
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2004, 06:03:30 PM »
Amazing how it was butchered down to a PG-13...Just like the "Alien vs Predator" movie will be.
 

JLscorpio

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 116
  • Karma: 2
  • I love YaBB 1 Gold!
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2004, 06:20:32 PM »
they better not make Alien vs. Predator a PG-13 that would go against everything that those movies are based on. Oh the horror.
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2004, 06:27:49 PM »
Guess what...They are.
 

js83

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2070
  • Karma: 20
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2004, 09:48:56 PM »
Guess what...They are.

are u sure?? movie aint even rated yet...got any links?
 

smerlus

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2004, 10:00:43 PM »
Guess what...They are.

are u sure?? movie aint even rated yet...got any links?

the PG-13 rating was just a quote from the exec producer in a UK magazine......the film hasn't been rated yet in america.....i think i read taht it's because the director wants an R and FOX wants PG-13 or some shit like that
 

Tha Crip

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2004, 10:20:43 PM »
if its rated PG13 im gonna go anyways
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #13 on: July 12, 2004, 12:26:22 AM »
 

smerlus

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2004, 01:23:17 AM »
www.bloody-disgusting.com

it's not an official site....the official site doesn't even have a rating and i read on a website that the reason you don't see any advertisments is because they don't know if it's PG 13 or R yet