The first REAL look at Britney Spears titty.

[Woodrow]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,5-2004313023,00.html

[CRAFTY]

Not really a top-class pic, but hey, at least it's something...next step: Playboy

[Maestro Minded]

fake

[smerlus]

fake

i think they're fake too, somehting didn't look right.... if you match her nipple on one tittie to where it should be in the other...you should at least see both nipples

so it defeats your lone nipple theory

[Diabolical]

All that fuss for nothin'...

[mauzip]

[Montana00]

eh, your probably right



they had about 15 of these from different angles, none had a slip

[Woodrow]

I'm not British, but does the Sun put out fake shit that often?

All the "nude celeb" articles/photos I've seen from them seem to be legit.

As far as the titties themselves go, they are probably fake.

If you would read the article, the sun explained that:

"Amazingly, it went unnoticed until a photographer developed unprocessed shots of the event last month in Belfast." It does sound suspect, but who knows.

Who knows, perhaps the sun got 0wn3d.

[Diabolical]

Some of the stuff the sun says is crap but they would never doctor a pic without saying that it was a mock up one

[Da WCC Hopar!]

ya dats shit is fake

[Jome]

It's not fake, several people from the audience confirmed that the slip happened, but obviously nobody got a picture of it..
Until some amateur photograph suddenly looked through his pictures a month later, and sold them to Matrix Syndication International Press Agency Ltd from where The Sun got it from.

http://www.matrixphotos.com/index.jsp <<<-- Serious press photos agency, they will be in deep horse shit if they started doctoring pics.

[Don Seer]

Some of the stuff the sun says is crap but they would never doctor a pic without saying that it was a mock up one

[Woodrow]

fake

wrong

[Montana00]

lol..............ok we got schooled at spotting a fake, cuz its not.

well props to woodrow

[Jay ay Beee]

As if the Sun would doctor a picture.

Idiots.