« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
  
Go Down

Author Topic: King Arthur  (Read 499 times)

Jome

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2004, 06:15:53 PM »
Keira Knightly said that in the "real" story, the warriors fought naked, and if it was in the manus, she would have done it..  >:(
Logged
 

bez

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #16 on: July 12, 2004, 06:23:34 PM »
Quote from: Jome on July 12, 2004, 06:15:53 PM
Keira Knightly said that in the "real" story, the warriors fought naked, and if it was in the manus, she would have done it..  >:(
she's georgous ain't she!
Logged
 

Sikotic™

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #17 on: July 12, 2004, 08:39:58 PM »
Quote from: Jome on July 12, 2004, 06:15:53 PM
Keira Knightly said that in the "real" story, the warriors fought naked, and if it was in the manus, she would have done it..  >:(

WTF!!! Then why didn't they make it a straight to video porno and have her fight naked with a bunch of other women?
Logged
My Chihuahuas Are Eternal

THA SAUCE HOUSE
 

Don Seer

Re: King Arthur
« Reply #18 on: July 13, 2004, 01:38:29 AM »

i umm went to glastonbury (skareboarding) on sunday afternoon? (its not far from here..).. lol

Logged
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #19 on: July 13, 2004, 01:49:11 AM »
Quote from: Now_I_Know on July 11, 2004, 06:03:30 PM
Amazing how it was butchered down to a PG-13...Just like the "Alien vs Predator" movie will be.

 >:( >:(
Logged
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #20 on: July 13, 2004, 12:59:05 PM »
Quote from: smerlus on July 12, 2004, 01:23:17 AM
Quote from: Now_I_Know on July 12, 2004, 12:26:22 AM
www.bloody-disgusting.com

it's not an official site....the official site doesn't even have a rating and i read on a website that the reason you don't see any advertisements is because they don't know if it's PG 13 or R yet


I know it's not an official site, but it's very reliable.
Logged
 

GoodLuvn169

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2004, 05:41:47 PM »
I really don't have a desire to see that film
Logged
 

Eddie G.

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9707
  • Karma: 884
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2004, 05:51:36 PM »
Quote from: Ultimate Warrior on July 11, 2004, 06:20:32 PM
they better not make Alien vs. Predator a PG-13 that would go against everything that those movies are based on. Oh the horror.
Fuck makin it PG-13.  I'm sick of these fuckin pussy studios not realeasing real R rated movies anymore.  10 years ago, all these action moves like "Chronicles of Riddick" and that shit would be hard R rated flicks.  These bitches won't put any money into something that is hardcore.  They should learn, remember that MGM fiasco when they released "Rollerball" with a PG-13 rating?  Some movies were meant to be rated R.
Logged
 

GoodLuvn169

  • Guest
Re: King Arthur
« Reply #23 on: July 15, 2004, 05:53:53 PM »
Quote from: "The Untouchable" WSConnected187 on July 15, 2004, 05:51:36 PM
Quote from: Ultimate Warrior on July 11, 2004, 06:20:32 PM
they better not make Alien vs. Predator a PG-13 that would go against everything that those movies are based on. Oh the horror.
Fuck makin it PG-13.  I'm sick of these fuckin pussy studios not realeasing real R rated movies anymore.  10 years ago, all these action moves like "Chronicles of Riddick" and that shit would be hard R rated flicks.  These bitches won't put any money into something that is hardcore.  They should learn, remember that MGM fiasco when they released "Rollerball" with a PG-13 rating?  Some movies were meant to be rated R.
I agree
Logged
 
Pages: 1 [2]
  
Go Up
« previous next »