Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Evidence that Kerry is even worse than Bush

<< < (6/9) > >>

Sikotic™:

--- Quote from: Maradona on July 25, 2004, 02:40:57 PM ---
--- Quote from: Sikotic aka Birdman on July 25, 2004, 02:36:37 PM ---I definitely don't feel safer with Bush because his actions worry me. Every action has a reaction.

--- End quote ---

True, but Kerry won't change much when it comes to relations with the Middle East.

--- End quote ---

Unfortunately, I think you're right. I do feel he will improve things domestically, something Bush hasn't really done.

To me Kerry is the lesser of two evils

Maradona:
Yeah, that's how I feel. I think things at home will be better, we will have better relations with other nations because we won't be attacking random countries for no reason, but as far as foreign policies (minus wars) go, nothing much will change.

So if everything stays the same, but we improve things here at home, then why not. Kerry will get my vote.

Montana00:
speaking of striking a fear of possible terrorism, lets see how the 1 billion dollar price tag of security at the olympics pays off.

Machiavelli:

--- Quote ---Yeah, that's how I feel. I think things at home will be better, we will have better relations with other nations because we won't be attacking random countries for no reason, but as far as foreign policies (minus wars) go, nothing much will change.
--- End quote ---

"Attacking countries for no reason"...
so you think going into afganistan was for no reason...I think you forgot 9/11. Afganistan was ruled by a terriost taliban government that housed Al Quiada and was resnsible for 9/11.

Also we attacked Iraq cuz there was a dictaor there that killed  hunderds of thousands of incent people in the middle east and was threating countries(isreal0 and was invading kuwait and all the oil filled countries and taking there oil.


--- Quote ---speaking of striking a fear of possible terrorism, lets see how the 1 billion dollar price tag of security at the olympics pays off.
--- End quote ---


would u rather be safe or sorry?

Thirteen:

--- Quote from: Machiavelli on July 25, 2004, 03:50:51 PM ---
--- Quote ---Yeah, that's how I feel. I think things at home will be better, we will have better relations with other nations because we won't be attacking random countries for no reason, but as far as foreign policies (minus wars) go, nothing much will change.
--- End quote ---

"Attacking countries for no reason"...
so you think going into afganistan was for no reason...I think you forgot 9/11. Afganistan was ruled by a terriost taliban government that housed Al Quiada and was resnsible for 9/11.

Also we attacked Iraq cuz there was a dictaor there that killed  hunderds of thousands of incent people in the middle east and was threating countries(isreal0 and was invading kuwait and all the oil filled countries and taking there oil.


--- Quote ---speaking of striking a fear of possible terrorism, lets see how the 1 billion dollar price tag of security at the olympics pays off.
--- End quote ---


would u rather be safe or sorry?


--- End quote ---

the only reason i disagree with the iraq war is because they changed the reason for doing it so many times...other than that, i think good things will come from it.....we just have to wait and sit it out

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version