Lifestyle > Train of Thought

Do Americans who are voting Kerry vote for him for any reason besides...

<< < (11/20) > >>

*Jamal*:

--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on October 21, 2004, 06:19:31 AM ---I guess I have to repeat myself for the stubborn, pseudo-smart ones.
yea if you talk about visiting, all I can say is that noone will visit wyoming for electoral votes anyway, since they'll vote republican. it is a total waste of time for both candidates. why would a democrat go there if he wont get the majority and therefore nothing anyway. why would a republican go there if he gets the majority no matter what.
on the other side, we got the same thing with new york (for democrats) and also california.

--- End quote ---

Are you expecting me to prove you wrong on the same thing more than once? Not all small states always vote Republican. If you really think that, then you're officially an idiot.

7even:

--- Quote from: DaBoss on October 21, 2004, 06:29:14 AM ---
--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on October 21, 2004, 06:19:31 AM ---I guess I have to repeat myself for the stubborn, pseudo-smart ones.
yea if you talk about visiting, all I can say is that noone will visit wyoming for electoral votes anyway, since they'll vote republican. it is a total waste of time for both candidates. why would a democrat go there if he wont get the majority and therefore nothing anyway. why would a republican go there if he gets the majority no matter what.
on the other side, we got the same thing with new york (for democrats) and also california.

--- End quote ---

Are you expecting me to prove you wrong on the same thing more than once? Not all small states always vote Republican. If you really think that, then you're officially an idiot.



--- End quote ---

lol of course I dont think this. fuck small/huge. point is, there are certain states that always vote for a certain party.

*Jamal*:

--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on October 21, 2004, 06:23:10 AM ---well that's really noble but what Nader achieved in 2000 were 2 things:

1) proving that he hasnt the slightest thing to say with this system.. he might change something indirectly like you state, but he has no direct say like in germany where even the smallest parties have a few seats. you go and study a book, one reason why Nader candidates is to prove how unjust the electoral system you have is.

2) taking Gore's votes, so that Bush became President.

--- End quote ---

1) Might change some things? Do you even know anything about Nader's accomplishments?
2) Ok, so whose fault is that? If Nader didn't want Bush to be president, then he shouldn't have ran. If Nader doesn't care, why do you?

*Jamal*:

--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on October 21, 2004, 06:30:34 AM ---
--- Quote from: DaBoss on October 21, 2004, 06:29:14 AM ---Are you expecting me to prove you wrong on the same thing more than once? Not all small states always vote Republican. If you really think that, then you're officially an idiot.

--- End quote ---

lol of course I dont think this.  fuck small/huge. point is, there are certain states that always vote for a certain party.

--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on October 21, 2004, 04:43:52 AM ---No, I know exactly how it works. At least as good as you, probably even better. And it sucks. The small states arent considered either way cause they always vote for republicans. New York isnt considered cause they always vote for the democrats. I have the knowledge I need, so shut up.

--- End quote ---



LMAO. OWNED. NOW WILL YOU SHUT UP?

dexter:
Bush ia a moron a FOOL JOKER COURT JESTER Coke Snorting LOSER RETARD!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version