It's May 13, 2024, 02:30:16 AM
Quote from: Woodrow on October 29, 2004, 04:24:15 PMIt's funny how this turned into a "Bush" thread instead of a Bin Laden thread.Actually the original poster was curious whether we felt this video would help Kerry or Bush. Below you can find one of the many reasons it will help Kerry.http://homepage.mac.com/njenson/movies/notconcerned.html
It's funny how this turned into a "Bush" thread instead of a Bin Laden thread.
If Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.
Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 03:28:27 PMIf Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.Is your sentence a joke i missed? Damn man, you are paranoid with Bush! If Clinton "captured or killed" Saddam Hussein as he promised the American people he would this war never would have fought. Ok? Lol.
Englewood. Are you really serious? Your citing a random Op/Ed piece as your rational for why Bush needs to be re-elected? As it stands today over 35 newspapers that endorsed Bush in 2000, "flip flopped" and decided to instead endorse Kerry. Kerry has recieved about 40% more newspaper endorsements than Bush. The most impressive to date is the recent endorsement from The Economist. The well-regarded Economist typically leans slightly republican and enjoys a large republican readership.Additionally, editors from the American Conservative have also endorsed Kerry. If you want to post random quotes about Bush being good, and Kerry being bad I suggest you look for credible sources. I've already posted plenty of credible sources explaining why Bush is bad for America including well respected academics, newspapers, magazines, and even well-regarded members of the Republican Party. The reason you can't find any is simple: your side is wrong.
Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 09:16:06 PMEnglewood. Are you really serious? Your citing a random Op/Ed piece as your rational for why Bush needs to be re-elected? As it stands today over 35 newspapers that endorsed Bush in 2000, "flip flopped" and decided to instead endorse Kerry. Kerry has recieved about 40% more newspaper endorsements than Bush. The most impressive to date is the recent endorsement from The Economist. The well-regarded Economist typically leans slightly republican and enjoys a large republican readership.Additionally, editors from the American Conservative have also endorsed Kerry. If you want to post random quotes about Bush being good, and Kerry being bad I suggest you look for credible sources. I've already posted plenty of credible sources explaining why Bush is bad for America including well respected academics, newspapers, magazines, and even well-regarded members of the Republican Party. The reason you can't find any is simple: your side is wrong. LOL @ YOU chastising ME for posting a random op-ed piece. Just because you haven't heard of the author, doesn't make her points any less valid or credible. It's funny that you're talking about ME being close minded, but you dismiss the article I posted simply because you aren't familiar with the author, Why don't you respond to my points about how our sworn enemies (their words) support John Kerry???Just because more newspapers support Kerry than Bush, does that make him the better candidate? Does the fact that 35 newspapers changed their views 4 years down the road make John Kerry the better candidate? If you think so...
I quoted Nobel Laureates, prominent Republicans, former members of the Bush Administration, and conservative magazines.
Quote from: Antonio on October 29, 2004, 06:58:29 PMQuote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 03:28:27 PMIf Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.Is your sentence a joke i missed? Damn man, you are paranoid with Bush! If Clinton "captured or killed" Saddam Hussein as he promised the American people he would this war never would have fought. Ok? Lol.I was quoting Bush, while you were making up a quotation from Clinton. I don't recall Clinton ever promising he would "capture or kill" Saddam Hussein.
damn 100,000 innocent dead? that sounds worse than saddam. Damn, bin laden mocking bush. maybe if bush didnt go to iraq bin laden would be dead. Hopefully we get a leader who can lead out country better then bush, and not sit in a room for 7 minutes full of children while we are under attack.
Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 09:20:10 PMQuote from: Antonio on October 29, 2004, 06:58:29 PMQuote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 03:28:27 PMIf Bush "captured or killed" Usama Bin Laden as he promised the American people he would this tape never would have aired.Is your sentence a joke i missed? Damn man, you are paranoid with Bush! If Clinton "captured or killed" Saddam Hussein as he promised the American people he would this war never would have fought. Ok? Lol.I was quoting Bush, while you were making up a quotation from Clinton. I don't recall Clinton ever promising he would "capture or kill" Saddam Hussein. Did you recall that's the main reason why USA failed in Iraq? Cause they didnt think about killing Saddam and cleaning the area. They just won the battle, saved Kuwait and left Iraq like that, with Saddam alive and with all the innocent people killed by Saddam's people as a revenge. Did you recall that? Did you recall Kerry wants to do the same now? I'm not talking about the war, but the after-war.
Quote from: Ant on October 30, 2004, 01:21:23 AMI quoted Nobel Laureates, prominent Republicans, former members of the Bush Administration, and conservative magazines.So you're telling me all these people are non-partisan??!!!LOL!I subscribe to the print version of NR...
Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 06:34:17 PMSo after running around for 4 years pretending his is "tough on terrorist" he has no success stories. Usama is still at large and still able to direct his organization. LOL! Have you done ANY research on this or are you just spouting the party line? So killing and capturing 3/4 of the major al queda leadership is not a success story? No terrorist attacking in the US since 9/11 isn't a success story? Damn man, don't let your hate for Bush cloud your common sense. Quote from: Ant on October 29, 2004, 06:34:17 PM360 tons of explosives are missing. You post so many articles up, it seems absurd you haven't seen the news today. Step your game up.
So after running around for 4 years pretending his is "tough on terrorist" he has no success stories. Usama is still at large and still able to direct his organization.
360 tons of explosives are missing.