It's May 14, 2024, 08:26:20 PM
The traditional definition of marriage between one man and one woman has existed for thousands of years. Now in my opinion gays should be given civil unions which gives them the same visitation rights, tax benefits, and so forth.
Quote from: Maestro Minded on February 04, 2005, 01:08:59 PMif a man/woman wants to marry an animal, shall we let him/her??No, because the animal can't really consent to it, with gay marriage you have two consenting adults.I would be better to say "what's next? a brother that wants to marry his sister?" There you have the same thing, two consenting adults, who's to say that's sick? That's just as sick as two men marrying in some people's minds.
if a man/woman wants to marry an animal, shall we let him/her??
that theory doesnt work imo .. why cant a man marry a dog, casue fucking animals is illegal (isnt it).. why cant a man marry his sister, cause its incest, and thats illegal
Quote from: white boy on February 05, 2005, 08:30:46 AMthat theory doesnt work imo .. why cant a man marry a dog, casue fucking animals is illegal (isnt it).. why cant a man marry his sister, cause its incest, and thats illegalwhy can't a man marry and man, cause that's gay marriage, and that's illegal.I don't see why brother and sister shouldn't be able to marry if a man can marry another man. There might be a good argument to separate the two different cases, if so, let's hear it.
Fuck religion and bush.
Gays shouldnt marry. Its an unnatural thing. And if you allow it, you will get alot more gays in the future.
"You are so proud of your holy absitence! Like touching a woman would kill you! Women are filthy little complications. That's why you became a priest. It has nothing to do with your convenient little stories. Now you're so proud of your church full of virgins?" - the voice of a posessed woman on the movie Stigmata, talking (actually screaming) to a priest who struggles with his feelings and his faith.