Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Come up with actual good reasons on why Nash was deserving of the MVP
7even:
watch nash' game today and watch duncan's last game, you know why nash is mvp and duncan is not. watch heat playing without shaq you know why shaq is not. haters.
OneHittaSpitta:
--- Quote from: 7even the Annoyed One on May 20, 2005, 09:11:31 PM ---watch nash' game today and watch duncan's last game, you know why nash is mvp and duncan is not. watch heat playing without shaq you know why shaq is not. haters.
--- End quote ---
Duncan plays within the offense probably better then any superstar in the league. And he still puts up his consistent numbers every game. Even the last game against Seattle. His shooting was off, and still manage to put up his usual numbers cus he;s smart enough to find other ways to make him, and his teammates better. He got to the line and scored, when his shot wasnt going down. He's probably the smartest post player in the last 15 yrs in this leagie. He knows how to make u either foul him, or give up and easy shot. Nash is a good player, no doubt....but in NO way is he the MVP lol. Like i said before, Nash was nobody on a team as good as Dallas. Now, because he's on a team that fits damn near ANY point guards style he looks amazing. Put Nash on the Hawks, and he wont even make the all star team. Put Duncan, Iverson, KG.....etc....on ANY team, and theyd still be the best players in the league. This point is pretty obvious. If u know basketball, then u get it. If not...then youre arguing for Nash lol
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
You're speaking non-sense man...I'm pretty sure Chucky Atkins wouldn't be shit if he was the starting point guard for the Suns this year...Nash is an excellent player, get over it...PeACe
OneHittaSpitta:
--- Quote from: Now_Im_Blowed on May 21, 2005, 11:53:02 AM ---You're speaking non-sense man...I'm pretty sure Chucky Atkins wouldn't be shit if he was the starting point guard for the Suns this year...Nash is an excellent player, get over it...PeACe
--- End quote ---
he's good, i didnt argue that. But all of a sudden, he's the most valuable player in the league when he hasnt been shit the rest of his career? That doesnt seem odd to u? The best players are good year in and year out. Even when their teams suck, theyre good. Even if they go to a shitty team, theyre still good. Shit, u know i dont like Kobe too much...but his year IMO was better then Nash too, and he didnt have a great year this year. Id put at least 3 players above Nash and probably more. I dont think its a race thing at all, but i do kinda think its an image thing. The press shouldnt be involved in any of this shit, but it is. Nash is a good image for the league. he's a family man, he's a passer before scorer, and he plays on a team that is exciting to watch. Did stockton ever win MVP? No...and his worst year was better then Nash's 2004-2005 season, he just played on the Jazz lol. What do u think would happen if u switched Iverson and Nash with eachother? Imagine how SHITTY Philly would be lol. I dunno, he's good....but MVP of the NBA? Whatta joke...
Javier:
Most Valueble=Best Player There is no way around it. . The development of Stoudamire is natural so this was his first year of superstar status that you will see with Amare for years to come. Is it Garnett's fault that he was with a bad team? Duncans injury but still had an amaazing and better year than Nash, Dirk(there goes the its cuz of the white guy arguement out the window). All of these players were better than Nash.
You can not replace Nash with Atkins. You have to replace nash with somebody that posted up similiar numbers to him How about Luke Ridnour? Jason Kidd? not Atkinds
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version