Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Come up with actual good reasons on why Nash was deserving of the MVP
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Javier on May 22, 2005, 10:42:36 AM --- Most Valueble=Best Player There is no way around it. . The development of Stoudamire is natural so this was his first year of superstar status that you will see with Amare for years to come. Is it Garnett's fault that he was with a bad team? Duncans injury but still had an amaazing and better year than Nash, Dirk(there goes the its cuz of the white guy arguement out the window). All of these players were better than Nash.
You can not replace Nash with Atkins. You have to replace nash with somebody that posted up similiar numbers to him How about Luke Ridnour? Jason Kidd? not Atkinds
--- End quote ---
So you think Luke Ridnour would be MVP if he was playing for the Suns? LMAO, come on now...I know that you know better than that.
Javier:
thats not even close to what i said.
You said "I'm pretty sure Chucky Atkins wouldn't be shit if he was the starting point guard for the Suns this year"
and i replied with "You have to replace nash with somebody that posted up similiar numbers to him How about Luke Ridnour? Jason Kidd? not Atkinds"
Nash was not the best player in the NBA. You cant argue that. 50 years from now people are going to be saying "What in the world were they thinking...Nash got the MVP over Duncan? Garnett? Shaq? Dirk? Even fucking Stoudamire?!"
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Javier on May 22, 2005, 12:22:07 PM ---thats not even close to what i said.
You said "I'm pretty sure Chucky Atkins wouldn't be shit if he was the starting point guard for the Suns this year"
and i replied with "You have to replace nash with somebody that posted up similiar numbers to him How about Luke Ridnour? Jason Kidd? not Atkinds"
Nash was not the best player in the NBA. You cant argue that. 50 years from now people are going to be saying "What in the world were they thinking...Nash got the MVP over Duncan? Garnett? Shaq? Dirk? Even fucking Stoudamire?!"
--- End quote ---
LMAO@saying that Luke Ridnour posts up similar numbers to Steve Nash...Man, you don't know your shit...I once thought you did, but you don't...Steve Nash is the leader of his team...Steve Nash plays on one of the NBA's better teams...That makes Steve Nash one of the better players in the NBA...I don't know how you don't see him as an MVP contender, what he did for the Suns was awesome...He was posting up more assists than I've seen done in a while, and on top of that, he could score as well (The playoffs have been proof)...His smarts is what makes him such a good player...Even I'm willing to admit that he played a better season than Kobe, and who woulda' ever thought I would say something against Kobe while ToNe was doing the opposite...I don't like Steve Nash, he's not one of my favorite players...But I know the game of basketball, and I know he was well deserving of the MVP...Hell, if Garnett would have gotten the MVP this season, it would definitely cause a lot more controversey...And if Shaq got the MVP while playing the worst season of his career, it would be a clear indication that the NBA is on a decline...Duncan could have gotten the MVP, but how many times does the man need it?...Dirk? Mavs vs. Suns is all I have to say...Stoudamire? I like Stoudamire more than I like Nash, but it's so obvious that Nash is more valuable to the Suns...He's the teams backbone...He's an excellent player, end of story...Nash is an overall better player than Stockton, and Nash's season this year was better than any of Stockton's seasons...You guys must be blind...Why would Nash win it if he wasn't that good? Ya'll simply don't know your shit...
Javier:
Luke Ridnour's Assist ratio was 33.5
Nash's Assist Ratio was 41.6
As a PG they were close. Of course nash was better but i think if Ridnour or Kidd would be on the Suns they would still be in the same spot they are in right now. Also, im not saying Nash wasnt a MVP candidate but just that he didnt deserve it it. And it shouldnt matter if Duncan has one already because no matter what it should go to the best player. And you cant take a series to show who was the MVP of the season such a small sample size
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Javier on May 22, 2005, 08:24:18 PM ---Luke Ridnour's Assist ratio was 33.5
Nash's Assist Ratio was 41.6
As a PG they were close. Of course nash was better but i think if Ridnour or Kidd would be on the Suns they would still be in the same spot they are in right now. Also, im not saying Nash wasnt a MVP candidate but just that he didnt deserve it it. And it shouldnt matter if Duncan has one already because no matter what it should go to the best player. And you cant take a series to show who was the MVP of the season such a small sample size
--- End quote ---
STFU with the ratios...Luke Ridnour averaged 5.9 assists while Steve Nash averaged 11.5...Yes, that's right, Ridnour averaged less assists than Kobe Bryant. How are you comparing him to Steve Nash in terms of point guards? Damn man, step up your b-ball knowledge...Luke Ridnour on the Suns would mean Spurs vs Mavs for the Western Conference Finals...PeACe
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version