It's May 25, 2024, 06:54:26 AM
Aid the larger countries in each region of the world. In Latin America, you aid Mexico, Peru and Brazil until they are strong enough to aid others. In Africa, you aid South Africa, the Congo, Nigera and maybe Egypt until they could be strong enough to help others. In Asia, Japan is already strong, and China is gaining power, so they could start off the trend until South Korea and India and others could help out countries like Thailand and the Phillipeans.I figure wealth could spread, and by aiding the bigger countries first, they could eventually aid the littler countries until the world is at a place where large massive fathoms don't happen, and we could not have people living in tents in India, and people living in hut shacks in Central America. It's just a suggestion.
So, it's like this...You have a classroom thats full of starvin kids...who decide one day to start giving most of its food to one kid...so then he can become strong and healthy...then go to college, hopefully make something of himself.... then come back and help the others?that take s a lot of time..and what if that kid fucks up?
Quote from: Captain on June 30, 2005, 05:55:21 PM its all about exploitation...And you don't think Western European countries and the United States have anything to do with that? Do some research.
its all about exploitation...
This may seems a little crazy, and it may never work but I figure if we can have a legit U.N., and they actually back this, it could possibly work.The best place to figure out what people need is to actually ask the people themselves. Now I was thinking, Europe and the U.S. are too far away from the countries that need aid, and we can't possibly aid the whole world. And what we are doing is not working, maybe it's designed not to work to keep Europe and the U.S. is power, but who knows. Anyways, my suggestion.Aid the larger countries in each region of the world. In Latin America, you aid Mexico, Peru and Brazil until they are strong enough to aid others. In Africa, you aid South Africa, the Congo, Nigera and maybe Egypt until they could be strong enough to help others. In Asia, Japan is already strong, and China is gaining power, so they could start off the trend until South Korea and India and others could help out countries like Thailand and the Phillipeans.I figure wealth could spread, and by aiding the bigger countries first, they could eventually aid the littler countries until the world is at a place where large massive fathoms don't happen, and we could not have people living in tents in India, and people living in hut shacks in Central America. It's just a suggestion.
Quote from: Darth Angel on June 30, 2005, 01:29:59 PMThis may seems a little crazy, and it may never work but I figure if we can have a legit U.N., and they actually back this, it could possibly work.The best place to figure out what people need is to actually ask the people themselves. Now I was thinking, Europe and the U.S. are too far away from the countries that need aid, and we can't possibly aid the whole world. And what we are doing is not working, maybe it's designed not to work to keep Europe and the U.S. is power, but who knows. Anyways, my suggestion.Aid the larger countries in each region of the world. In Latin America, you aid Mexico, Peru and Brazil until they are strong enough to aid others. In Africa, you aid South Africa, the Congo, Nigera and maybe Egypt until they could be strong enough to help others. In Asia, Japan is already strong, and China is gaining power, so they could start off the trend until South Korea and India and others could help out countries like Thailand and the Phillipeans.I figure wealth could spread, and by aiding the bigger countries first, they could eventually aid the littler countries until the world is at a place where large massive fathoms don't happen, and we could not have people living in tents in India, and people living in hut shacks in Central America. It's just a suggestion.Sounds like Reaganomics.
Yeah, it's really hard to mess with Darth Vader. He's the man. Anybody who doesn't see that must have a drunk for a daddy.