Would you sacrifice public approval rating for national security?

[Uncle Tom]

It seems that with the current disapproval rating of America's presidency, people are favoring media friendly philanthropists over common sense. It must be a generational thing though, you children raised with sensationalized media never had a chance.

[7even]

it's not about security, but fear and control, moron

[Don Rizzle]

whats the point in the poll when you have clearly made up your own mind, its way too biased...

[I TO DA GEEZY]

whats the point in the poll when you have clearly made up your own mind, its way too biased...

As if YOU haven't made up your mind. His opinion wouldn't matter to you and you would simply express yours- THIS IS WHAT POLLS ARE ABOUT.
Bias?- I think you're the one with a BIAS really.



And to answer the question-IN A HEARTBEAT.

[J Bananas]

it's not about security, but fear and control, moron

LOL, whatever hippie, SIMPLIFY MAN!

[Don Rizzle]

whats the point in the poll when you have clearly made up your own mind, its way too biased...

As if YOU haven't made up your mind. His opinion wouldn't matter to you and you would simply express yours- THIS IS WHAT POLLS ARE ABOUT.
Bias?- I think you're the one with a BIAS really.



And to answer the question-IN A HEARTBEAT.

Yes, safety>popularity
 No, I am an unrealistic socialist
 Perhaps, this is my safest answer
 I treat politics like a popularity contest

how can you say the choices have no bias??

if you want my answer i would sacrifice the populatity for security i don't know any sane person who wouldn't, but at the end of the day if GW was worried about national security he could've done more to prevent 9/11 and he wouldn't of invaded iraq and he would have sorted out the israel palestine issue.....

[I TO DA GEEZY]

whats the point in the poll when you have clearly made up your own mind, its way too biased...

As if YOU haven't made up your mind. His opinion wouldn't matter to you and you would simply express yours- THIS IS WHAT POLLS ARE ABOUT.
Bias?- I think you're the one with a BIAS really.



And to answer the question-IN A HEARTBEAT.

Yes, safety>popularity
 No, I am an unrealistic socialist
 Perhaps, this is my safest answer
 I treat politics like a popularity contest

how can you say the choices have no bias??

if you want my answer i would sacrifice the populatity for security i don't know any sane person who wouldn't, but at the end of the day if GW was worried about national security he could've done more to prevent 9/11 and he wouldn't of invaded iraq and he would have sorted out the israel palestine issue.....

Sorry! I haven't even looked at the choices he gave(they finished loading only after I lowered the page) I simply addressed the topic, my bad. Good looking out.

[7even]

Im not a hippie anymore.. and this thread is propaganda

[J Bananas]

you are under my spell. go buy SUV's!