It's May 07, 2024, 10:43:16 PM
I does suck that this didn't pass. It could have made the whole UK safier.Their needs to be more legislation like this passed.
Quote from: Birch Barlow on November 14, 2005, 05:41:48 PMI does suck that this didn't pass. It could have made the whole UK safier.Their needs to be more legislation like this passed.But Britain's left wing media, left wing elite, and Islamic radicals don't want it to pass.The only people who wanted the terror law to pass are average every day Britons....and obviously no one cares about them.
Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 10, 2006, 03:16:12 AMiraq would just get annexed by iranThat would be a great solution. If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
iraq would just get annexed by iran
You are not a real American.
this 'article' is full of shit.. left wing media my arse.. you dont watch or read our media.. you only hear what you;'re spoon fed you retard.. the whole of europe is pushing to the right under the pressures of increased immigration/economic migration.the main reason is the law would violate human rights stuff already agreed.. it would mean possible legal action against the country from those groups.the other thing not mentioned that majorly fucked this situation up was that the police themselves lobbied MPs.. and that worked against them..i dont believe the public were massively for it..
this 'article' is full of shit.. left wing media my arse.. you dont watch or read our media.. you only hear what you;'re spoon fed you retard.. the whole of europe is pushing to the right under the pressures of increased immigration/economic migration.the main reason is the law would violate human rights stuff already agreed.. it would mean possible legal action against the country from those groups.the other thing not mentioned that majorly fucked this situation up was that the police themselves lobbied MPs.. and that worked against them.. the police force is not a political organisation and their involvement has kicked off a debate in itself.i dont believe the public were massively for it..
edit: i do agree with what the article was saying about the bbc this time they were not putting across a representitive view they just interview loads of people against the bill and hardly anyone in favour of it, they did the same with the comments on their website i'm not happy they have been trying to distort what the nations view is, they are usually very good at being unbiased but in this case i think the editors have done to much selective publishing.
Quote from: Don Rizzle on November 15, 2005, 02:11:09 AMedit: i do agree with what the article was saying about the bbc this time they were not putting across a representitive view they just interview loads of people against the bill and hardly anyone in favour of it, they did the same with the comments on their website i'm not happy they have been trying to distort what the nations view is, they are usually very good at being unbiased but in this case i think the editors have done to much selective publishing.Overseer is definitely in denial if he thinks the BBC isn't left wing. It is not his fault though, he just hasn't been exposed to different media sources. I personally read the BBC's website everyday and I am usually disgusted by the blatant anti-American, anti-Israeli, anti-west coverage. Do we even need to mention the scandal from a few years back when the heads of BBC were forced to step down because of biased coverage?As for the law itself, as an American I cannot possibly fathom the idea of working against their government to prevent them from fighting terror. Grow some fucking balls, Britain, and quit being so damn politically correct. What happened to the bad ass country led by the great Winston Churchill?
It's called democracy.