It's May 13, 2024, 02:21:35 AM
lol...Sorry man, this "so called" riddle was an analogy targeted at Jamal. Something to help him get along with reality.Something to point out what happens when you generalize when your generalization entails the contradiction of known/given facts.
my throat hurts, its hard to swallow, and my body feels like i got a serious ass beating.
Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 21, 2005, 09:19:32 AMYeah, the only thing that's contradicted is that they're PRIMARILY descendedWhich is the only thing that was debated like you said:Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 20, 2005, 02:33:55 PMThe only thing that's debated is if Ashkenazi Jews are PRIMARILY descendant of the Khazars.... MEANING THAT THE ONLY THING THAT'S DEBATED WAS DISPROVED.... 1+1P.S Non-Jewish groups do not mean Khazar and this is while paternally they still were descendants of exiled Jews(intermix).
Yeah, the only thing that's contradicted is that they're PRIMARILY descended
The only thing that's debated is if Ashkenazi Jews are PRIMARILY descendant of the Khazars....
up until they had done this research, it was believed that Ashkenazi Jews were PRIMARILY descendants of this ONE TRIBE (Khazar).
the fact that they're primarily descendants is disputed... which is exactly what I said from the beginning.
Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 04, 2006, 01:26:21 PM up until they had done this research, it was believed that Ashkenazi Jews were PRIMARILY descendants of this ONE TRIBE (Khazar).Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 05, 2006, 03:02:41 AM the fact that they're primarily descendants is disputed... which is exactly what I said from the beginning.So was it disputed or believed? LMAO would you decide?I know you Zionists aren't really familiar with research and facts (as evident from my sig), but things are believed and research showing otherwise leads to there being a dispute... or if something is disputed, it is researched... it's not a fact that they're primarily descendants, it's a theory... so therefore it was "generally" believed... meaning there was doubt/dispute... leading to research to a stronger doubt... your problem seems to be not only lack of education in regards to such matters, but you also need a better understanding of terms such as "believe", "fact", "dispute", etc... but being that you're a Zionist, I suggest you focus mainly on the word "fact" because that word seems to be foreign to you guys... do I need to get into what the scientific method is, and the meaning of the word hypothesis, etc? It's evident you're dumb, but you really can't be THIS dumb.I just paraphrased the findings of a research and it's conclusion.All you do is making these misguided assumptions about my statements' meanings and implications while addressing your sorry "ad hominem"(look it up son ) at me.The argument we had was over the existence of converted Jews. I presented the Khazars as an example, and showed that a proportion of Ashkenazi Jews (which make up the majority of Jews in the world today) are descendants of the Khazars. The only thing that research showed is that the proportion of Ashkenazi Jews being descendants of the Khazars is not as great as previously believed.. since I know you need help, this is implied when the word PRIMARILY was used. This means that my statement was correct, and all you did is argue even though the research just proved me right. What the fuck are you even arguing for?P.S Still don't get how Semite genes found among Ashkenazi Jews correlate with the extinction of exiled Jews [I understand that it's your assumption since neither of us claimed this before, (you don't have to bitch about it) but how did you reach it?Based on what?]Your statements implied that the converted Jews were extinct. I simply said that if somebody who's just as dumb as you... or close to being as dumb as you, since you're one of a kind... would use your "theory"... they could easily imply that the exiled Jews are extinct. I said this would be a stupid assumption to make... just as stupid as everything you've said.
Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 18, 2005, 02:27:59 PMQuote from: I TO DA GEEZY on December 18, 2005, 01:19:58 PMmost Jews are descendants of those who were exiled from this land, Is that fact, or a conclusion you have reached? If you still don't know the difference, then go find out before you answer.It is a fact, and one that you need to know in order to debate on this matter.
Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on December 18, 2005, 01:19:58 PMmost Jews are descendants of those who were exiled from this land, Is that fact, or a conclusion you have reached? If you still don't know the difference, then go find out before you answer.
most Jews are descendants of those who were exiled from this land,
things are believed and research showing otherwise leads to there being a dispute
Gotcha. Check the statistics on what proportion of Jews are "Semite-Jews"... and what proportion are Ashkenazi.
This argument started when one of us(not me ) made the claim of Ashkenazi Jews not being "semite"/"descendants of exiled Jews".This is what this research disproves(While proving that even Jews who have "east european genes"\"non-semite genes" still have semite genes in them to go along->making them descendants of exiled Jews).
You guys really found each other.
yes, it's clear that all the boxes are empty. several reasons:a) we know that the boxes were locked before the coins were scattered over them. how can the coins get into a locked box?g) who checked the first four boxes? how do we know that person is honest? if all five coins have already been recovered there can't be any more coins in the other six boxes.h) there are no coins, and there are no boxes.
The majority of Jews(including Ashkenazi Jews) are semites, HENCE, descendants of exiled Jews from the land of Yisrael.