It's October 07, 2025, 08:27:05 AM
^ The only explanation for that is that you have to realize wrestling's all bullshit storylines, so sometimes shit doesn't make sense. When they bought WCW, the WCW title was so prestigious that they couldn't just trash it, so they continued on having people win the title and being world heavyweight champ. The WWE Title was called the "WWE champ" or whatever, and they've flirted around doing things like unifying the belts, etc. but ultimately, it doesn't make any sense to have two champs. The funniest thing is, that for the last few years, they've acted as if the title that was defended on RAW was the 'big' title, and that was often the old WCW title. It's really pretty confusing and redundant... but with the brand split, it was easier for them to explain two belts since one was defended on Smackdown and one on Raw. They need to seriously bring back the WCW Televison title belt. The Television title belt was brought around to be defended, weekly, on the television show and not just the pay per views. They should bring that belt back, it's a great idea. For a while, they even had the cruiserweight belt 'retired' which was a travesty of justice. The ABSOLUTE most confusing thing is that they have two tag team championships. I don't even know what the fucking difference is in what they call them, and I don't remember them holding the WCW tag belts over from the wcw purchase. It makes no sense at all, especially when you have mixed ppv's when they introduce 4 different people as being tag champ.
^ Suck a dick. I'm not complaining It's silly. Get a grip. :argue: Why you sound so mad?Apologize for lying about me, bitch.
I might have to sit my ass home on Friday and check this out. Thank God they didn't pass it to Orton or Mark Henry.